You are here

The boar genotype influence on sow reproductive performance

The efficiency of pig industry is largely influenced by the level of sows’ reproductive performance that determines the amount of growing and fattening pigs for slaughter. Therefore, the study of different factors influence on sow reproductive performance, in particular boars’ genotype, is a topical issue in pig breeding.

The study was conducted in the PAE “Agroprodservice” of Ternopil region in 2014. There were found some differences between the sows’ reproductive performances in the first farrow, paired with boars of different genotypes. In particular, multiple pregnancy (11,8 piglets), milk production (65,2 kg), number and weight of piglets weaned per litter (10,9 piglets and
72,0 kg, respectively) and piglet survival (95,6 %) had sows, paired with boars of American selection. The sows of this group are characterized by higher complex index of reproductive performance (CIRP) – 120,6 points, selection index of sows’ reproductive performance (SISRP) – 98,1 points and survival index – 94,8 %.

Worse reproduction performance had sows, paired with purebred Yorkshire boars. Their multiple  pregnancy was lower by 1,2 heads, milk production – 4,5 kg, number of weaned piglets per litter – 1,5 heads, weight of weaned piglets  per litter – 9,6 kg,
a piglet weaning weight – 0,4 kg, piglet survival –1,6, %, CIRP – 28,8  points, SISRP – 9,8 points, survival index – 11,5 % as compared with sows, paired with boars of American selection.

When analyzed the second farrow it is worth noting the improving of sows reproductive performance, paired with different genotypes boars for all studied parameters compared to the first farrow, except piglet survival, which decreased on average by 2,4 %, and, consequently, survival index, which depends on piglet survival (–1,2 %).

The highest rates of multiple  pregnancy (13,7 piglets), milk production (82,4 kg), number of weaned piglets per litter (12,1 piglets), weight of weaned piglets  per litter (81,3 kg), piglet survival (89,6 %), CIRP (125,1 points), SISRP (118,5 points) and survival index (97,5 %) were observed in sows, paired with boars of American selection.

In the second farrow worse reproductive performance characterized sows, paired with purebred Duroc boars; the sows had significantly lower multiple  pregnancy – by 1,6 piglets (p<0,05), milk production – 26,1 kg (p<0,001), number of weaned piglets per litter – 1,9 piglets (p<0,05), CIRP – 22,2 points (p<0,01), SISRP – 26 points (p<0,01) and survival index –13,8 % (p<0,05) than sows, paired with boars of American selection.

Based on our research results, the best reproduction performance in the third farrow is also characteristic for sows, paired with boars of American selection, yet by milk production, greater piglet weaning weight and SISRP index the sows, paired with Duroc boars were better.

Depending on boars genotypes, the multiple  pregnancy of sows in the third farrow in the studied herd was within 11,0–12,7 heads, milk production – 40,7–62,7 kg, number of weaned piglets  per litter – 9,8–11,7 heads, weight of weaned piglets  per litter – 58,0–74,9 kg, a piglet weaning weight – 6,4–7,1 kg, piglet survival – 86,4–92,0 %, CIRP – 85,6–106,1 points, SISRP – 84,1–98,9 points, survival index – 79,6–94,7 %.

A complex index of reproductive performance of sows (CIRP), which depends on litter size born alive, milk production, number and weight of piglets weaned per litter, regardless of parity were higher in sows, paired with boars of American selection – 106,1–125,1 points and prevailed the litter size born alive of sows, paired with boars of other genotypes, by the first litter – on 24,7–28,8 points, the second – 15,0–22,2 points, the third litter – on 1,8–20,5 points.

Depending on the genotype of boars selection index SISRP at the first farrow was 88,3−118,5 points, at the second – 92,5–118,5 points, the third − 79,6–94,7 points. The greater SISRP at the three farrows had sows, paired with boars of American selection (98,1–118,5 points). Worse selection index SISRP at the first and the second farrows characterized sows, paired with Duroc boars (86,7 and 92,5 points, respectively), for the third farrow – sow, paired with terminal boars (84,1 points).

The sows’ reproductive performance was studied by the survival index, which depends on multiple pregnancy and piglet survival. In the first farrow the survival index was 78,3–94,8 %, the second – 83,4–97,2 %, the third farrow – 79,6–94,7 %. The highest values of survival index regardless of farrow had the sows, paired with boars of American selection – 94,7–97,2 %. On average the greater survival index showed sows in first farrow (89,9 %).

Thus, the CIRP index, the SISRP indexes and survival index, which comprehensively characterize the reproductive performance, where higher in the sows, paired with boars of American selection, that gives grounds to state about boar genotype influence on sow reproductive performance and recommend wide use of American selection boars for foundation stock reproduction in the herd of the PAE “Agroprodservice”.

Key words: genotype, reproductive performance, complex index of reproductive performance (CIRP), selection index of sows’ reproductive performance (SISRP), survival index.

1. Bal'nykov, A.A. (2014). Produktivnost hryakov zarubezhnoy selektsii i ih ispolzovanie pri promyishlennom skreschivanii [The productivity of foreign breeding boars and their use in industrial cross]. Rozvedennja i genetyka tvaryn: mizhvid. temat. nauk. zb. K., 48: 12–18 [in Russian].

2. Berezovskiy, M.D., Getya, A.A., & Manko, O.A. (2010). Polipshennya m’yasnih yakostey svyney velykoi biloi porody metodami vnutrishnoporodnoi selektsii [Improving of meat quality of Large white breed pigs by interbreed selection methods]. Visnyk agrarnoi nauky Prychornomor’ia: Mykola'v, 1: 38–44 [in Ukrainian].

3. Gryshyna, L. (2010). Noviy zavodskiy typ sviney u velykiy biliy porodi [The new type of pigs in a Large white breed]. Agrarnyy tyzhden, 40: 11–12 [in Ukrainian].

4. Gryshyna, L.P. (2012). Udoskonalennya metodiv otsinky pleminnoi tsinnosti knuriv-plidnikiv u selektsiynomu stadi [Improving of boars evaluation of breeding value methods in the breeding herd]. Tavriyskyi naukovyi visnyk: Herson, 78. 2 (I): 56–61[in Ukrainian].

5. Lesnoy, V.A. & Kozin, A.I. (2008). Sistema selektsionno-plemennoy rabotyi s porodam sviney [System of selection and breeding work with pigs]. Ekskljuzyv Agro: Novye tehnologii v agrobyznese, 2 (8): 74–75 [in Russian].

6. Loban, N.A., Sheyko, I.P., Petrushko, I.S. & other (2008). Povyshenie produktivnyh kachestv svinomatok belorusskoy krupnoy beloy porody [Increasing the productive qualities of sows Belarusian large white breed]. NAU Belarusi, Nauch.-prakt. tsentr NAN Belarusi po zhivotnovodstvu: Minsk: Armadalodzhyk: 19 [in Russian].

7. Kovalenko, V.P., Bolelaya, S.Yu., Polupan, Yu.P., & Plotkyn, S.Ya. (1997). Rekomendatsii po ispolzovaniyu modeli osnovnyih selektsioniruemyih priznakov selskohozyaystvennyih zhivotnyih i ptitsyi [Recommendations on the use of models of the main selection parameters of breeding in animal husbandry and poultry]. Herson.: 44 [in Russian].

8. Zeldin, V., Halak, V., Zeldina, Yu. & other (2014). Selektiyna otsinka oznak produkyivnosti svyney velykoi biloi porody [Breeding performance of evaluation parameters of Large white breed pigs]. Agrarnyy tyzhden, 11–12: 66 [in Ukrainian].

9. Kovalenko, V.A., Stepanov, V.I., Myhaylov, N.V., & Zhuravlev I.N. (1984). Selektsionnyie priyomi i metody, povyshayushchie effektivnost plemennoy raboty v spetsializirovannyh liniyah [Breeding techniques and methods that increase the efficiency of breeding work in specialized lines]. Teoriya i praktika selektsionno-plemennoy raboty v svinovodstve: sb. nauch. tr.: Persyanovka.: 8–16 [in Russian].

10. Topiha, V.S. & Volkov, A.A. (2008). Ratcionalne vykorystannia vitchyznyanogo ta zarubizhnogo genofondu svyney v suchasnyh pleminnyh gospodarstvah Ukrainy [Rational using of Ukrainian and foreign genepool in modern pig breeding farms in Ukraine]. Tavriyskyi naukovyi visnyk: Herson: 3(2): 78–81 [in Ukrainian].

11. Tsereniuk, O.M., Hvatov, A.I. & Stryzhak, T.A. (2010). Efektyvnist selektsiynyh i otsinnyh indeksiv materinskoi produkyivnosti svyney [The efficiency of selection and evaluation indices of pig maternal productivity]. Nauk.-tehn. byuleten NAANU, In-t tvarinnitstva, 102: 173–181 [in Ukrainian].

12. Clutter, A., Buchanan, D. & W. Luce. Evaluating Breeds of Swine for Crossbreeding Programs. Oklahoma State University, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources [Internet resource]. – Access mode: http://www.thepigsite.com/
articles/2622/evaluating-breeds-of-swine-for-crossbreeding-programs.

13. Lukač, D. & Vidovič, V. (2013). Parameters of genetic and phenotypic type in pigs mating in pure breed and crossbreeding on litter size. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8 (37): 4664–4669.

14. Šprysl, M., Čítek, J., Stupka R. & other (2012). The significance of the effects influencing the reproductive performance in pigs. Research in pig breeding. Czech Republic. 6 (1).

AttachmentSize
PDF icon stavetska.pdf525.81 KB