You are here

Sowsartificial insemination optimization at the middle size farm conditions

The article highlights the optimal variant of main herd sows artificial insemination multiplicity definition.
The research was carried out at the “Shubske” Farm of Bogodukhiv District of the Kharkov Region at the pig farm of Welsh breed pure breeding. The 120 sows totally (by 12 per week with an even distribution in groups with different insemination multiplicity) was selected for the optimal multiplicity (from one to four times) estimation. The following indices of sows reproductive capacity: number of born alive, weight of the nest at birth and weaning and piglets survival before weaning on the 28th day were evaluated per the sows groups. Recalculation to the nest mass at the weaning at 45 days was carried out according in the current instruction of pigs appraisal.
The research results were estimated by traditional methods of variation statistics. The Microsoft Excel was used for database creation and data statistical analysis.
In the conditions of small and medium-size farm the boars-sires using efficiency is small. Usually, the number of boar-sire exceeds the required load in order to the risks reduce. Accordingly, there is a significant reserve for the a larger number of sperm-dosages using per sow. At the same time, the duration of the period of sows productive insemination during estrus (up to 36 hours after estrus detection) allows to increase the multiplicity of insemination to four or more times.
In the first place, the percentage of productive fertilized sows was estimated for each group with different multiplicity of their insemination during estrus. As a result, different efficacy of sows was detected. The sows were used most effectively for their three-time and quadruple insemination (93.33 % for both variants). For double insemination, the indicator was slightly less effective – 90.00 %. The smallest percentage of productively-fertilized sows was obtained for single insemination – 86.67 %. At the same time, the difference in the most contrasting groups for this indicator was 6.66 %. Between the groups within the limits of the double-quadruple insemination the difference was two times smaller – 3,33 %.
The main effective reproductive capacity indicator of sows is themultiplicity. The maximum values of sows multiplicity were obtained at quadruple and triple insemination (p <0.01 to the once insemination sows group). The predominance of other groups of sows for quadruple insemination was in the range of 0.23–12.42 %. The greatest difference was obtained between the groups for single and four-time sows insemination. At the same time, the difference between the triple and quadruple insemination was insignificant (0.03 piglets per sows per farrow in absolute terms). The difference between double insemination compared to triple and quadruple was significantly higher (0.08 and 0.11 piglets per sows per farrow in absolute terms). There were no differences between the groups of the sows for the double, triple and quadruple insemination. There was a sequence – 1.5 piglets, 0.08 piglets, 0.03 piglets at the multiplicity difference compare to the insemination frequency increasing. Accordingly, the greatest effect to the multiplicity was occurred at the multiplicity of insemination increasing from single to double.
The sows multiplicity growing also positively affected to the average weight of the nest at birth. At the same time, the average weight of one piglet at birth with an increase of multiplicity did not increase.
The largest values of weight of the nest at birth were obtained triple and quadruple sows insemination (p <0.01 to the once insemination sows group). At the same time, the difference between groups of double and single insemination by this indicator was unreliable. There was a sequence – 0.5 kg, 0.75 kg, 0.03 kg at the difference in weight of the nest at birth compare with a frequency of insemination increasing. Consequently, the greatest effect to the weight of the nest at birth was occurred at multiplicity of insemination increasing from double to triple.
No less important sows reproductive ability indicator is the weight of the nest at weaning. Though at most farms the early weaning of piglets from sows is used, the recount on the 45th or 60th day after weaning is used for the comparative assessment.
The largest values of weight of the nest at weaning were also obtained for quadruple and triple insemination. However, there was no significant difference in the weight of the nest at weaning in the groups of the sows with different rates of insemination. Compared to a group of sows at single insemination the double - quadruple insemination allows to obtained additionalat 1.13–1.67 % larger nest at weaning (the difference between the groups is unreliable).
In addition, the piglet survival at weaning was estimated. The obtained results indicate a decrease of the survival index with multiplicity growing.
The smallest piglets survival before weaning was obtained for the group with quadruple insemination, the greatest piglets survival – with single insemination.
The sows multiplicity insemination increasing during estrus from single to double is increases the efficiency of sows using by 3.33 %, to triple and quadruple – by 6.66 %.
The effectiveness of double – quadruple sows insemination of the main herd was established compared to single insemination. For such variants of insemination, the maximum values of sows multiplicity – 12,96 and 12,93 piglets per farrow (p <0.01 to the once insemination sows group) were obtained.
The multiplicity increasing was positively affected to weight of nest at birth and at weaning increasing.
Prospects for further researches are the complex reproductive ability assessment at the expense of breeding and evaluation index, different multiplicity of checked sows insemination estimation.
Key words: pig breeding, productivity, reproductive ability, artificial insemination, sows, multiplicity of insemination, sperm of boar-sire.
 
  1. Shherban', T. V. (2014). Reproduktivnі jakostі svinomatok mirgorods'koi’ porodi za shreshhuvannja z knurami m'jasnogo naprjamu produktivnostі [Reproductive qualities of sows of Mirgorod breed for crossing with meat breeds production line]. Vіsnik Poltavs'koi’ derzhavnoi’ agrarnoi’ akademіi’ [Newsletter of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy], no. 1, pp. 125–129.
  2. Gorobec', V. O. (2013). Vіdtvorjuval'na zdatnіst' svinomatok za rіznih varіantіv pіdboru [Reproductive capacity of sows for different variants of selection]. Rozvedennja і genetika tvarin [Breeding and genetics of animals], no. 47, pp. 139–144.
  3. Stavec'ka, R. V., Pіotrovich, N. A. (2015). Vpliv genotipu knurіv na reproduktivnі jakostі svinomatok [Influence of genotype of buds on reproductive quality of sows]. Tehnologіja virobnictva і pererobki produkcіi’ tvarinnictva [Technology of production and processing of livestock products], no. 1, pp. 65–70.
  4. Zhukors'kij, O. M., Tsereniuk, O. M., Akimov, O. V. (2017). Pіdvishhennja vіdtvornoi’ zdatnostі svinomatok uel's'koi’ porodi [Improvement of reproductive capacity of sows of the Welsh breed]. Vіsnik agrarnoi’ nauki [Bulletin of Agrarian Science], no. 9, pp. 31–34.
  5. Tsereniuk, O. M., Akimov, O. V., Chereuta, Ju. V. (2015). Pіdvishhennja rіvnja vіdtvorjuval'nih jakostej svinomatok [Improvement of reproductive qualities of sows]. Vіsnik agrarnoi’ nauki Prichornomor’ja [Bulletin of agrarian science of the Black Sea region], no. 2, Vol. 2, pp. 187–192.
  6. Tserenyuk, O., Shkavro, N. (2015). Main QTL Genes polymorphism of new lines of Landrace and Wales pig breeds in Ukraine. Rozvitok nacіonal'noi’ ekonomіki: teorіja і praktika [Proc. international scientific and practical conference. April 3-4, 2015. The development of the national economy: theory and practice]. Ivano-Frankivsk-Ternopil, Vol. 1, pp. 155–156.
  7. Fontana, D. L., Ulguim, R. R., Sbardella, P. E., Bernardi, M. L., Wentz, I., Bortolozzo, F. P. Fixed-time post-cervical artificial insemination in sows receiving porcine luteinising hormone at oestrus onset. Anim Reprod Sci 144, 2014, pp. 109–114.
  8. Martinjuk, І. M. (2014). Shtuchne osіmenіnnja – bazovij metod vedennja galuzі svinarstva [Artificial insemination is the basic method of conducting the pig breeding industry]. Naukovo-tehnіchnij bjuleten' [Scientific and technical bulletin], no. 112, pp. 76–81.
  9. Sіdashova, S. O., Saglo, O. F., Peretjat'ko, L. G., Pogrіbna N. M. (2013). Tehnologіchnij monіtoring zaplіdnenostі svinej pri rіznih metodah vіdtvorennja [Technological monitoring of fertilization of pigs with different reproduction methods]. Svinarstvo [Swine breeding], no. 62, pp. 32–41.
  10. Tsereniuk, O. M. (2015). Organіzacіja vіdtvorennja svinej metodom shtuchnogo osіmenіnnja: naukovo-praktichnі rekomendacіi’ [Organization of reproduction of pigs by artificial insemination: scientific and practical recommendations]. Kharkiv, IAS UAAS, 55 p.
  11. Tsereniuk, O. M., Akіmov, O. V., Timofіjenko, І. M., Chereuta, Ju. V. (2015). Tehnologіchnіst' pokaznikіv vіdtvorjuval'nih jakostej svinomatok [Technologicality of indices of reproductive qualities of sows]. Problemi zooіnzhenerіi’ ta veterinarnoi’ medicini: zbіrnik nauk. prac' [Problems of zoinengineering and veterinary medicine: collection of sciences works], no. 31, Vol. 1, pp. 53–59.
  12. Tserenyuk, O. M. Akimov, O. V., Martinyuk, I. M., Khvatova, M. A., Chereuta, Yu. V., Tserenyuk, M. V., Shkavro, N. M., Bordun, O. M., Chaliy, O. I. Landrace and welsh different lines boars sperm productivity. Academic science – problems and achievements XII. Vol. 2. 15-17 may 2017. North Charleston, USA, pp. 97–99.
  13. Tsereniuk, O. M., Chereuta, Ju. V. (2016). Іntensifіkacіja shtuchnogo osіmenіnnja svinej na osnovі vikoristannja priladіv dlja stimuljacіi’ matok [Intensification of artificial insemination of pigs based on the use of devices for stimulation of moths]. Naukovij progres u tvarinnictvі ta ptahіvnictvі: mat-li X Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. molod. vch., 11-12 zhovt. [Scientific progress in livestock and poultry farming: mat. X Allukr. science-practice conf. young the academic year]. Kharkiv, pp. 38–40.
  14. Ronald, B.S.M., Jawahar, T.P., Gnanaraj, P.T., Sivakumar, T. Artificial insemination in swine in an organized farm – A pilot study. Veterinary World. 2013, 6(9), pp. 651–654.
  15. Tsereniuk, O. M. (2015). Pіdvishhennja realіzacіi’ genetichnogo potencіalu produktivnostі svinej porіd landras і uel's za vіdtvorjuval'nimi ta vіdgodіvel'nimi jakostjami [Improvement of realization of genetic potential of productivity of pigs of Landrace and Welsh breed for reproductive and fattening qualities]. Kharkiv, IAS UAAS, 80 p.
  16. Zel'dіn, V. F., Logvіnenko, V. І., Zjel'dіna, Ju. S. (2015). Vpliv genotipu svinej na shvidkіst' i'h rostu ta m'jasnu produktivnіst' [Influence of the genotype of pigs on their growth rate and meat productivity]. Bjuleten' Іnstitutu sіl's'kogo gospodarstva stepovoi’ zoni NAAN Ukrai’ni [Bulletin of the Institute of Agriculture of the steppe zone of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine], no. 9, pp. 124–128.
  17. Vojtenko, S. L., Vasil'eva, O. O., Bejdik, N. M., Vishnevs'kij, L. V. (2016). Ocіnka rozvitku ta produktivnostі svinomatok v umovah plemіnnih gospodarstv Ukrai’ni [Estimation of development and productivity of sows in the conditions of breeding farms of Ukraine]. Naukovo-tehnіchnij bjuleten'Іn-t tvarinnictva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin Institute of animal husbandry NAAS], no. 115, pp. 41–46.
  18. Susol, R. L. (2014). Produktivnі jakostі svinej suchasnih genotipіv zarubіzhnoi’ selekcіi za rіznih metodіv rozvedennja v umovah Odes'kogo regіonu [Productivity of pigs of modern genotypes of foreign selection for different breeding methods in the conditions of the Odessa region]. Vіsnik Sums'kogo nac. agrar. un-tu [Visnyk of Sumy National University. agr. unt.], no. 2 (2), pp. 92–98.
  19. Topіha, V. S. (2016). Suchasnij stan ta perspektivi virobnictva visokojakіsnoi’ svinini z vikoristannjam svinej vіtchiznjanogo ta zarubіzhnogo pohodzhennja [Modern state and prospects of production of high quality pork using pigs of domestic and foreign origin]. Svinarstvo [Swine breeding], no. 68, pp.63–68.
  20. Knox, R. V. Artificial insemination in pigs today. Theriogenology. 2016, January, Vol. 85, Issue 1, pp. 83–93.
  21. Martinjuk, І. M., Timofіjenko, І. M., Chereuta, Ju. V. (2015). Pіdvishhennja efektivnostі shtuchnogo osіmenіnnja svinej [Increasing the efficiency of artificial insemination of pigs]. Tavrіjs'kij naukovij vіsnik [Taurian Scientific Bulletin], no. 93, pp. 139–144.
  22. Martinjuk, І. M. (2015). Velikoplіdnіst' porosjat za rіznih pokaznikіv bagatoplіddja ta vіku svinomatok [The fertility of piglets for different indicators of multiple fertility and age of sows]. Naukovo-tehnіchnij bjuleten' Derzhavnogo naukovo-doslіdnogo kontrol'nogo іnstitutu veterinarnih preparatіv ta kormovih dobavok і Іnstitutu bіologіi’ tvarin [Scientific and technical bulletin of the State Scientific-Research Control Institute for Veterinary Medicinal Products and Feed Additives and the Institute of Animal Biology], no. 16, Vol. 2, pp. 379–383.
  23. Koval'. O. A., Kalinichenko. G. І. (2013). Vpliv shreshhuvannja na vіdtvorjuval'nu zdatnіst' svinomatok. [Influence of crossing on the reproductive capacity of sows]. Zb. nauk. prac' Podіl's'kogo derzhavnogo agrarno-tehnіchnogo unіversitetu [Collected works of the Podilsky State Agrarian Technical University], no. 21, pp. 150–156.
  24. Povod, M. G., Іzhboldіna, O. O., Nesterov, A. M. (2015). Sezonna produktivnіst' svinomatok francuz'koi ta dats'koi selekcіi [Seasonal productivity of sows of French and Danish breeding]. Vіsnik agrarnoi’ nauki Prichornomor'ja [Bulletin of agrarian science of the Black Sea region], no. 2(2), pp. 200–204.
  25. Chereuta, Ju. V. (2014). Ergonomіchnі doslіdzhennja procesu shtuchnogo osіmenіnnja svinej [Ergonomic studies of artificial insemination of pigs]. Naukovo-tehnіchnij bjuleten' [Scientific and Technical Bulletin], no. 112, pp. 201–205.
  26. Povoznіkov, M.G., Reshetnik, A.O. (2017). Utrimannja ta gіgіjena svinej [Housing and hygiene of pigs]. Kamyanets-Podilsky, 272 p.
  27. Voloshhuk, V. M., Zasuha, Ju. V., Grishhenko, S. M., Grishhenko, N. P. (2015). Vpliv kratnostі godіvlі na ekonomіchnu efektivnіst' vіdgodіvlі molodnjaku svinej [Influence of feeding multiplicity on the efficiency of fattening of young piglets]. Naukovij vіsnik Nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu bіoresursіv і prirodokoristuvannja Ukrai’ni. Serіja: Tehnologіja virobnictva і pererobki produkcіi’ tvarinnictva [Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Series: Technology of production and processing of livestock products], no. 205, pp. 258–264.
  28. Mel'nik, Ju. F., Pishholka, V. A., Litovchenko, A. M. (2003). Іnstrukcіja z bonіtuvannja svinej. Іnstrukcіja z vedennja plemіnnogo oblіku u svinarstvі [Instruction for boning pigs. Instruction on keeping breeding records in pig breeding]. Kyiv, 64 p.
  29. Baranovskij, D.I., Hohlov, A. M., Getmanec, O. M. (2017). Biometrija v MS Excel [Biometrics in MS Excel]. Kharkiv, 228 p.
  30. Mark J., Estienne, Allen F., Harper. Using Artificial Insemination in Swine Production: Detecting and Synchronizing Estrus and Using Proper Insemination Technique. Virginia Cooperative Extension. Retrieved from: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/414/414-038/414-038_....
  31. Petrone Rosalie, C. Using Commercially Available Hormones to Enhance Swine Reproductive Efficiency in Batch Management Systems.Thesis submitted to the faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Animal and Poultry Sciences. June 10, 2015. Blacksburg, VA, 88 p.
  32. Levis, D.G. Artificial Insemination of Swine. Universitty of Nebraska. 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.ansci.wisc.edu/jjp1/pig_case/html/library/ArtificialInsemSwin... Accessed March 1.

 

AttachmentSize
PDF icon tserenyuk_1_2018.pdf237.26 KB