You are here

×

Error message

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in bootstrap_table() (line 238 of /var/www/html/sites/all/themes/bootstrap/templates/system/table.func.php).

Growth performance of piglets fed prestarter compound feeds with antimicrobial additives

The study examines the effect of feed additives (an acidifier and a phytobiotic) on the productivity and health status of young piglets. The aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of these additives in increasing average daily gain, improving feed conversion, and reducing the incidence of diarrhea. Three groups of animals were formed: a control group receiving a basal diet, and two experimental groups supplemented with an acidifier and a phytobiotic, respectively. Observations were conducted during the age periods of 22–28 and 29–35 days, corresponding to one week before and one week after weaning. At 22–28 days of age, the average daily gain (ADG) was 254 g in the control group, 305 g in the acidifier group, and 320 g in the phytobiotic group. During the 29–35 day period (post-weaning), ADG increased to 274 g, 326 g, and 369 g, respectively. Feed intake in the experimental groups exceeded that of the control group by 18–27 g at 22–28 days and by 67–69 g at 29–35 days. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) was 1.51 in the control group, 1.48 in the acidifier group, and 1.30 in the phytobiotic group. The most pronounced differences were observed in the incidence of diarrhea, which reached 37.5 % in the control group, while decreasing to 10.1 % in the acidifier group and 8.3 % in the phytobiotic group. Thus, the results confirmed that dietary supplementation with an acidifier and a phytobiotic improves growth performance, increases feed intake, enhances feed efficiency, and reduces diarrhea incidence. The most pronounced effect was observed in the phytobiotic group, where ADG increased by 67–95 g, FCR decreased by 0.09–0.21, and diarrhea incidence was reduced by approximately 30 % compared with the control group. These findings highlight the promising potential of phytobiotics as an effective tool for improving productivity and maintaining pig health during the early post-weaning period.

Keywords: suckling piglets, weaning, acidifier, phytobiotic, average daily gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, diarrhea.

  1. Vlizlo, V.V., Fedoruk, R.S., Ratych, I.B., Vishchur, O.I., Sheremeta, V.I., Vushchan, V.V., Gunchak, Yu.P., Kotsiumbas, I.Yu., Levytskyi, T.R., Snitynskyi, V.V. (2012). Laboratory research methods in biology, animal husbandry and veterinary medicine: Reference book. Lviv: SPOLOM, 764 p. (In Ukrainian).
  2. Sobolyev, O.I., Nedashkivsʹkyy, V.M., Petryshak, R.A., Sobolievа, S., Petryshak, O., Liskovych, V., Kuzmenko, P. (2022). Methodology and organization of scientific research in animal husbandry. Bila Tserkva: LLC "Bilotserkivdruk", 256 p. (In Ukrainian).
  3. Alghirani, M.M., Chung, E.L.T., Jesse, F.F.A. (2021). Could Phytobiotics replace Antibiotics as Feed Additives to Stimulate Production Performance and Health Status in Poultry? An Overview. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research, Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 254–265.
  4. Ghimpețeanu, O.M., Pogurschi, E.N., Popa, D.C., Dragomir, N., Drăgotoiu, T., Mihai, O.D., Petcu, C.D. (2022). Antibiotic use in livestock and residues in food – A public health threat: a review. Foods. Vol. 11, Issue 10, 1430 p. DOI:10.3390/foods11101430
  5. Biswas, S., Ahn, J.M., Kim, I.H. (2024). Assessing the potential of phytogenic feed additives: A comprehensive review on their effectiveness as a potent dietary enhancement for nonruminant in swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, Vol. 108, pp. 711–723. DOI:10.1111/jpn.13922
  6. Caicedo, W., Chinque, D.M., Grefa, V.J. (2022). Phytobiotic additives and their eff ect on the productive performance of pigs. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 56, Issue 2, pp. 1–15.
  7. Pandey, S., Kim, E.S., Cho, J.H., Song, M., Doo, H., Kim, S., Keum, G.B., Kwak, J., Ryu, S., Choi, Y., Kang, J., Choe, J., Kim, H.B. (2023). Cutting-edge knowledge on the roles of phytobiotics and their proposed modes of action in swine. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Vol. 10. DOI:10.3389/fvets.2023.1265689
  8. Peng, C., Ghanbari, M., May, A., Abeel T. (2024) Effects of antibiotic growth promoter and its natural alternative on poultry cecum ecosystem: an integrated analysis of gut microbiota and host expression. Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 15. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1492270
  9. Ali, S.S., Al-Tohamy, R., Al-Zahrani, M., Badr, A., Sun, J. (2025). Essential oils and plant-derived bioactive compounds: a comprehensive review of their therapeutic potential, mechanisms of action, and advances in extraction technologies. Phytochemistry Reviews, Vol. 25, pp. 223–271. DOI:10.1007/s11101-025-10123-8
  10. de Sousa, D.P., Damasceno, R.O.S., Amorati, R., Elshabrawy, H.A., de Castro, R.D., Bezerra, D.P., Nunes, V.R.V., Gomes, R.C., Lima, T.C. (2023). Essential Oils: Chemistry and Pharmacological Activities. Biomolecules, Vol. 13, Issue 7, 1144 p. DOI:10.3390/biom13071144
  11. Garavito-Duarte, Ye., Deng, Z., Kim, S.W. (2025). Literature review: opportunities with phytobiotics for health and growth of pigs. Annals of Animal Science, Vol. 25, Issue 4, pp. 1237–1247. DOI:10.2478/aoas-2024-0119
  12. Kirchhelle, C. (2018). Pharming animals: a global history of antibiotics in food production (1935 2017). Palgrave Commun, Vol. 4, 96 p. DOI:10.1057/s41599-018-0152-2
  13. Ntsongota, Z., Ikusika, O., Jaja, I.F. (2025). The role of phytogenic feed additives in growth and immune response in livestock production: a global systematic review. Frontiers in Animal Science, Vol. 6. DOI:10.3389/fanim.2025.1703112
  14. Cojocariu, L.-C., Usturoi, M.-G., Usturoi, A., Lazăr, M., Balmuș, I.M., Simeanu, D., Radu-Rusu, R.-M. (2026). Phytobiotics as Dietary Natural Growth Promoters in Producing High-Quality and Safe Poultry Products – A Narrative Review. Agriculture, Vol. 16, Issue 4, 443 p. DOI:10.3390/agriculture16040443
  15. Madesh, M., Yan, J., Jinan, G., Hu, P., Kim, I.H., Liu, H.-Yu., Ennab, W., Jha, R. Cai, D. (2025). Phytogenics in swine nutrition and their eff ects on growth performance, nutrient utilization, gut health, and meat quality: a review. Stress Biology, Vol. 5, 11 p. DOI:10.1007/s44154-024-00209-2
  16. Rachwal, K., Gustaw, K. (2025). Plant-Derived Phytobiotics as Emerging Alternatives to Antibiotics Against Foodborne Pathogens. Applied Sciences, Vol. 15, Issue 12, 6774 p. DOI:10.3390/app15126774
  17. Radzikowski, D., Milczarek, A. (2022). Efficiency of herbs and botanicals in pig feeding. Animal Science and Genetics, Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 73–87. DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0015.9442
  18. Dimuccio, M.M., Conforti, V., Celentano, F.E., Circella, E., Salvaggiulo, A., Bozzo, G., Corrente, M. (2026). Regulation of antibiotic use in livestock: european and international strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance and ensure animal welfare. Antibiotics, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 67 p. DOI:10.3390/antibiotics15010067
  19. Waqas, M., Waqar, M., Jawhar, S.A., Salman, M., Rahman, A., Hussain, J., Mehmood, S., Nastoh, N.A., Chaijanc, M., Ahmad, S. (2026). Revitalizing rural poultry with phytobiotics: a natural path to sustainability. World’s Poultry Science Journal, pp. 1–49. DOI:10.1080/00439339.2026.2627510
  20. Zheng, S., Li, Y., Chen, C., Wang, N., Yang, F. (2025). Solutions to the Dilemma of Antibiotics Use in Livestock and Poultry Farming: Regulation Policy and Alternatives. Toxics, Vol. 13, Issue 5, 348 p. DOI:10.3390/toxics13050348
  21. Deminicis, R.G. da S., Meneghetti, C., Oliveira, E.B., de Garcia Júnior, A.A.P., Farias Filho, R.V., Deminicis, B.B. (2021). Systematic review of the use of phytobiotics in broiler nutrition. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages. Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 98–106. DOI:10.5965/223811712012021098.
  22. World Health Organization. (2014). Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. Geneva, 256 p.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon tytariova_1_2026_.pdf519.4 KB