You are here

The feeding of the broiler chickens on fodder with sulphate and Zink mixed ligand complex and their slaughter characteristics

The effectiveness of the use of sulfate and the mixed zinc ligand complex Zinc and the effect of their feeding on the slaughter indicators of broilers of the Cobb-500 cross were studied after the completion of scientific and economic experience and control slaughter conducted in the premises of the vivarium of the Bila Tserkva National Agricultural University.

The difference in feeding conditions between the groups was that for the poultry of the first group, depending on age, compound feed was prepared using zinc sulfate in a dose corresponding to the introduction of 60, 50 and 40 g of element per 1 ton of feed (control), for the second - using a mixed zinc ligand complex at a dose that also corresponds to the introduction of 60, 50 and 40 g of element per 1 ton, and for the third - using a zinc mixed mixed ligand complex at a dose corresponding to the introduction of 45, 37.5 and 30 g.

Zinc concentration in the mixed fodder decreased as the age of birds increased. The control slaughter, which has been carried out after the experiment, shows that the different dose use of Sulphate and Zinc mixed ligand complex differently influences on the slaughter characteristics of the control and experimental bird groups. Thus, the largest pre-slaughter weight (2649.3 g) of broiler chicks of the 3rd group is (p <0.01) if they consume mixed fodder with a mixed ligand complex of Zinc at doses corresponding to the adding of 45, 37.5 and 30 g of the element per 1 ton of mixed fodder.

The pre-slaughter weight of the 2nd group, which has consumed mixed fodder with Zinc mixed ligand complex at a dose corresponding to adding 60, 50 and 40 g of the element per 1 ton of feed is also higher than in the control group (2549.3 g). But the probable difference for this index is not established. In general, the pre-slaughtered weight of the 2nd and 3rd group is higher than the weight of the the control group, respectively by 4.6 and 8.7 %.

Regarding the mass of the gutted carcass, it was also greater in the birds of the 2nd and 3rd experimental groups, and the difference was significant.

An analysis of the relative indicators of the yield of slaughter products showed that they were better in poultry that consumed compound feeds with a mixed zinc ligand complex. So, the output of a half-gutted carcass was the largest among broilers of the 3rd experimental group (84.19 %), and the difference in this indicator compared with the control was significant (p <0.05).

Chickens of the 2nd and 3rd experimental groups showed a tendency to increase the output of the pectoral muscles, muscles of the limbs, skin, lungs and heart.

The results of scientific and economic experience have shown that feeding compound feed with the mixed zinc ligand complex, in comparison with sulfate, can improve the slaughter quality and yield of edible carcasses.

The relative index analysis of the slaughter products reveals that the poultry fed on Zinc mixed ligand complex, has better result.

Thus, the yield of a semi-eviscerated carcass is the highest in broiler chicks of the experimental group № 3 (84.19 %), and the difference in this characteristics has been compared with the control group (p <0.05).

There is an output increasing tendency of the thoracic muscles, limb muscles, skin, lung and heart in the 2nd and 3rd experimental group. But the probable difference of these indexes in the control and experimental groups has not been established, except for the heart output.

Thus, it can be concluded that broiler chicks fed on fodder with Zinc mixed ligand complex, in comparison with Sulfate one, makes it possible to improve the slaughter characteristics and the yield of edible parts of the carcass, and the optimum dose is equivalent to 37.5 g of the element per 1 ton of the feed.

Key words: broiler chickens, pre-slaughter weight, slaughter yield, carcass weight, mass of internal organs, Zinc mixed ligand complex, Zinc sulfate.

1.   Akbaev, M., Malofeeva, N.(2003). Rezervy povyshenija produktivnosti brojlerov [Reserves to increase the productivity of broilers].Pticevodstvo[Poultry farming].no. 7, pp.5–7.

2.   Kravcіv, R.J.(2004). Bіologіchna rol' mіkroelementіv v organіzmі tvarin [Biological role of microelements in the body of animals]. Naukovij vіsnik LNAVM іm. L.G. Ґzhic'kogo [Scientific herald of LNAVM them. Lg Gzhytsky].Vol.7,no. 2, Part 6, pp. 63–70.

3.   Borisenko, V.G., Jastrebov, K.Ju., Іonov, І.D.(2004). Amіnokislotne zhivlennja [Amino Acid Nutrition]. Suchasne ptahіvnictvo[Contemporary Poultry Farming].no. 10,9p.

4.   Borodaj, V.P., Zadorozhnіj, A., Zadorozhnja, G. (2003). Stan ta naprjami naukovih doslіdzhen' u godіvlі pticі [The state and trends of research in the feeding of poultry].  Naukovij vіsnik NAU [Scientific herald of NAU]. Issue 63, pp. 109–111.

5.   Vajzelin, G.N., LevoskoM.Ju.(2011). Otkormochnye i mjasnye kachestva cypljat-brojlerov pri ispol'zovanii innovacionnyh tehnologij [Feeding and meat qualities of broiler chickens when using innovative technologies]. Kormlenie sel'skohozjajstvennyh zhivotnyh i kormoproizvodstvo [Farm animal feeding and fodder production]. no.7, pp. 32–42.

6.   Vertіjchuk, A.І., Glebova, Ju.A. (2012).Vpliv godіvlі pticі na jakіst' produkcіі [Influence of feeding on quality of produce]. Naukovij vіsnik Nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu bіoresursіv і prirodokoristuvannja Ukraini. Ser.: Tehnologіja virobnictva і pererobki produkcії tvarinnictva.  [Scientific herald of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine. Series: Technology of production and processing of livestock products].Issue 179, pp. 136–142.

7.   Voronov, M., Abdulhalimov, R.(2005). Rezul'taty otkorma brojlerov otechestvennyh i zarubezhnyh krossov [The results of fattening broilers domestic and foreign crosses]. Pticevodstvo [Poultry farming]. no.7, 6p.

8.   Vjajzenen, G.N., Vjajzenen, G.A., Tokarev, A.I.(2004).Novoe v promyshlennom proizvodstve jekonomicheski chistogo mjasa brojlerov. [New in the industrial production of economically pure broiler meat].Zootechny.no. 2, pp. 30–32.

9.   Denin, N., Kashevarov, M.(2002).Kormovoj belok: reshenie problemy [Feed protein: problem solving].Poultry farming. no. 8, pp. 10–12.

10. Lemesheva, M.M.(2003). Amіnokislotne zhivlennja pticі [Amino Acid Bird Feed]. Suchasne ptahіvnictvo [Contemporary Poultry Farming]. no.12, l7 p.

11. Mel'nik, A.Ju. (2015).Dejakі pokazniki mіneral'nogo ta lіpіdnogo obmіnіv u kurchat-brojlerіv 33-dobovogo vіku za vikoristannja preparatu dekavіt [Some indicators of mineral and lipid metabolism in broiler chicks of 33 days of age for the use of decavet]. Vіsnik Sums'kogo nacіonal'nogo agrarnogo unіversitetu. Serіja: «Veterinarna medicina» [Bulletin of the Sumy National Agrarian University. Series: "Veterinary Medicine"].no. 7 (37), pp. 44–47.

12. Mel'nik,V.(2003). Viroshhuvannja brojlerіv [Growing broilers]. Suchasne ptahіvnictvo [Contemporary Poultry Farming]. no.12, 18p.

13. Merkur'eva, E.K. (1983).Genetika s osnovami biometrii [Genetics with the basics of biometrics].Moscow, Kolos. 424 p.

14. Іbatulіna, І.І., Zhurovs'kogo, O.M. (2017).Metodologіja ta organіzacіja naukovih doslіdzhen' u tvarinnictvі: posіbnik [Methodology and organization of research in animal husbandry: manual].Kyiv,Agrarian science. 328 p.

15. Klіcenko, G.T., Kulik, M.F., Kosenko, M.V. (2001). Mіneral'ne zhivlennja tvarin[Mineral feeding of animals]. Kyiv: Svіt, 575 p.

16. Maljuga, L.V., Mihal's'ka, V.M., Shevchenko, L.V. (2008). Osoblivostі nakopichennja mіdі ta cinku v tkaninah kurchat-brojlerіv pri їh viroshhuvannі na kombіkormah z kompleksnimi spolukami mіkroelementіv [Features of the accumulation of copper and zinc in the tissues of broiler chickens when they are grown on mixed fodders with complex compounds of trace elements]. Naukovі dopovіdі NAU [Scientific reports of NAU]. 2 (10), pp. 1–8.

17. Medvіd', S.M., Gunchak, A.V., Gutij, B.V., Ratich, І.B. (2017). Perspektivi racіonal'nogo zabezpechennja kurchat-brojlerіv mіneral'nimi rechovinami [Prospects for rational supply of broiler chickens with mineral substances]. Naukovij vіsnik L'vіvs'kogo nacіonal'nogo unіversitetu veterinarnoї medicini ta bіotehnologіj іmenі S.Z. Ґzhic'kogo [Scientific herald of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Gzhytsky].Vol. 19, no.79, pp. 127–134.

18. Polіshhuk, A.A., Bulavkіna, T.P. (2010).Suchasnі kormovі dobavki v godіvlі tvarin ta pticі [Modern feed additives for feeding animals and poultry]. Efektivnі kormi ta godіvlja [Effective feeding and feeding].no.7, pp. 24–28.

19. Richards, D.D., Gizen, Je. E., Shirli, R.B. (2011).Organicheskie mikrojelementy: neot#emlemyj komponent sovremennogo kormlenija [Organic micronutrients: an integral component of modern feeding]. Efektivne ptahіvnictvo [Effectivepoultryfarming]. no. 3(75), pp. 28–31.

20. Sichov, M. (2017). Fazova godіvlja brojlerіv [Phase feeding of broilers]. Nashe ptahіvnictvo [Ourpoultryfarming]. no.5, pp. 66–68.

21. Jurchenko, V.V. (2013). Znizhennja zabrudnennja dovkіllja za rahunok faktorіv godіvlі pticі [Reduction of environmental pollution due to the factors of feeding birds]. Problemi zooіnzhenerіi' ta veterinarnoї medicini [Problems of zoinengineering and veterinary medicine]. Issue 26(1), pp. 135–141.

22. Janovich, D.V. (2002). Vіkovі zmіni vmіstu cinku і mіdі v tkaninah kurej [Age changes in the content of zinc and copper in the tissues of chickens]. Bіologіja tvarin [Biology of animals]. Vol. 4, no. 1–2, pp.92–95.

23. Jastrebov, K.Ju., Chigrin, A.І. (2003). Normovane protei'nove zhivlennja [Normified protein feed]. Suchasne ptahіvnictvo [Contemporary Poultry Farming].  no. 6, pp. 12–13.

24. Brzóska, M. M., Moniuszko-Jakoniuk, J. (2001). Interactions between cadmium and zinc in the organism. Food Chem. Toxicol.  Vol. 39, pp. 967–980.

25. Peluffo, H., Acarin, L.J. (2005). Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase expression in the postnatal rat brain following an excitotoxic injury.  Neuroinflammation.  Vol. 2,  12 p.

26. Laity, J. H., Andrews, G. K. (2007). Understanding the mechanisms of zinc-sensing by metal-response element binding transcription factor-1 (MTF-1). Arch Biochem Biophys. Vol. Jul 15, no.463(2), pp. 201–210.

27. Jackson, K. A., Valentine, R. A., Coneyworth, L. J. (2008). Mechanisms of mammalian zinc-regulated gene expression.  Biochem Soc Trans.  Vol. Dec.36, no. 6, pp. 1262–1266.

28. Maret, W. (2000).The function of zinc metallothionein: A link between cellular zinc and redox state. J. Nutrition. 130, no. 5, pp. 1455–1458.

29. Palmiter, R.D. (2004).Protection against zinc toxicity by metallothionein and zinc transporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. Vol. 101, no. 14, pp. 4918–4923.

30. Sensi, S.L., Jeng, J.M. (2004). Rethinking the excitotoxic ionic milieu: the emerging role of Zn2+ in ischemic neuronal injury. Curr. Mol. Med.  Vol. 4, pp. 87–111.

31. King, J.C., Cousins, R.J., Shils, M.E., Shike, M., Ross, A.C. (2005).Zinc. In: Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease (10th ed.).  Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. pp. 271–285.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon redka_1_2019.pdf522.79 KB