You are here

Comparative analysis of the diversity of bees in agroecosystem habitats

Biodiversity has a great importance on agroecosystems, since it determines their actual and potential productivity. Bees provide crucial ecological service in the agricultural landscape in most geographical regions because they are considered to be predominant and most economically important group of pollinators. The objective of the study was the assessment of bees (domestic, wild, bumblebees) diversity in different types of habitats in agroecosystems of Central Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. Bee communities were investigated in agrocenosis, semi-natural habitats and ecotones between on territories of 6 farms. In total were sampled 1131 individuals of bees that were presented by 60 species. Species composition, density and richness of bees were investigated. Indexes of Shannon, Simpson and Sorensen were used for biodiversity analysis. The results indicated that the species richness of bees grows by gradient: agrocenosis – semi-natural habitat – ecotone. The most common and spread species were Apis mellifera L., Bombus lapidarius L., B. terrestris L., Halictus simplex Blüthgen, Systropha curvicornis Scopoli, Lasioglossum leucozonium Schrank. Density of Apidae increases in agrocenosis and falls in semi-natural habitats. Forming of bees’ fauna in agrocenosis depends on bees fauna of semi-natural habitats. Availability of ecotones promotes increasing of bee diversity in agroecosystems because it performs preservation function for biota and improves the spreading of bees and other species. The presented results could be used to predict changes in the formation of bee entomocomplexes in order to preserve their biodiversity.

Key words: agroecosystems, habitats, bees diversity, species richness, species density.

 

 

  1. Andersen, A.N., Ludwig, J.A., Lowe, L.M., Rentz, D.C. (2001). Grasshoppers as bioindicators: responses to ecological disturbance in the Australian seasonal tropics. Austral Ecology, 26, pp. 213‒222.
  2. Banaczak, J. (1980). Studies on methods of censusing the numbers of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Polish Ecological Studies, 6, pp. 355‒366.
  3. Banaszak, J., Twerd, L., Sobieraj-Betlinska, A. Kilinska, B. (2017). The Moravian gate as route of migration of thermophilous bee species to Poland: fact or myth? A case study in the “Góra Gipsowa” steppe reserve and other habitats near Kietrz. Polish Journal of Entomology, 86, pp. 141–164.
  4. Celli, G., Maccagnani, B. (2003). Honey bees as bioindicators of environmental pollution. Bulletin of Insectology. 56 (1), pp. 137‒139.
  5. Churchill, T.B., Arthur, J.M. (1999). Measuring spider richness: effects of different sampling methods and spatial and temporal scales. Journal of Insect Conservation, 3, pp. 287‒295.
  6. Clair, A.L., Zhang, G., Dolezal, A.G., O’Neal, M.E., Toth, A.L. (2022). Agroecosystem landscape diversity shapes wild bee communities independent of managed honey bee presence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 327 p. DOI:10.1016/j. agee.2021.107826
  7. Dennis, P., Bogers, M.M.B., Bunce, R.G.H., Herzog, F., Jeanneret P. (2012). Biodiversity in organic and low-input farming systems. Handbook for recording key indicators. Wageningen, Alterra, Alterra-Report 2308. 92 p.
  8. Emmerson, M. (2016). How Agricultural Intensification Affects Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Advances in Ecological Research, 55, pp. 43–97. DOI:10.1016/bs.aecr.2016. 08.005
  9. Holzschuh, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. (2010). How do landscape composition and configuration, organic farming and fallow strips affect the diversity of bees, wasps and their parasitoids? J. Anim. Ecol., 79, pp. 491‒500.
  10. Kitching, R.L., Orr, A.G., Thalib, L., Mitchell, H., Hopkins, M.S., Graham, A.W. (2000). Moth assemblages as indicators of environmental quality in remnants of upland Australian rain forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, pp. 284‒297.
  11. Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B.E., Cane, J.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C., Tscharntke, T. (2007). Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci., 274, pp. 303‒313.
  12. Krahner, A., Schmidt, J.,Maixner M., Porten, M., Schmitt, T. (2021). Evaluation of four different methods for assessing bee diversity as ecological indicators of agro-ecosystems Ecological Indicators, 125 p. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107573
  13. Kremen C., Williams, N.M., Aizen, V.F., Gemmill-Harren, B., Lebuhn, G., Minckley, R. (2007). Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecology Letters, 10, pp. 299‒314.
  14. Matias, D.M., Leventon, J., Rau, A., Borgemeister, C., Wehrden, H.V. (2017) A review of ecosystem service benefits from wild bees across social contexts. Ambio, 46, pp. 456–467
  15. Potts, S.G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L., Ngo, H.T., Biesmeijer, J.C., Breeze, T.D., Dicks, L.V. (2016). Summary for Policymakers of the Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Germany.
  16. Rainio, J., Niemelä, J. (2003). Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12 (3), pp. 487‒506.
  17. Read, J.L., Andersen, A.N. (2000).The value of ants as early warning bioindicators: responses to pulsed cattle grazing at an Australian arid zone locality. Journal of Arid Environments, 45, pp. 231‒251.
  18. Ricketts, T., Regetz, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C., Bogdanski, A. (2008). Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol. Lett., 11, pp. 499‒515.
  19. Schweiger, O., Maelfait, J.P., Van Wingerden, W., Hendrickx, F., Billeter, R., Speelmans, M. (2005). Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organizational levels and spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, pp. 1129‒1139.
  20. Szujecki, A. (1980). Ekologia owadów leśnych. Warszawa: PWN, 603 p.
  21. Thompson, H., Hunt, L. (1999). Extrapolating from Honeybees to Bumblebees in Pesticide Risk Assessment. Ecotoxicology, 8 (3), pp. 147‒166.
  22. Twerd, L., Sobieraj-Betlinska, A. (2020). Wild bee (Apiformes) communities in contrasting habitats within agricultural and wooded landscapes: implications for conservation management. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 22, pp. 358–372 DOI:10.1111/ afe.12391
  23. Uzman, D., Reineke, A., Entling, M.H., Leyer, I. (2020). Habitat area and connectivity support cavity-nesting bees in vineyards more than organic management. Biological Conservation,Vol. 242. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108419
  24. Villet, M.H,. Capitao, I.R. (1996). Cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae) as indicators of habitat and veld condition in valley bushveld in the Great River Valley. African Entomology, 4, pp. 20‒284.
  25. Westerkamp, Ch., Gottsberger, G. (200). Diversity Pays in Crop Pollination. Crop Science, 40(5), pp. 1209‒1222.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon dyman_2_2022.pdf1.02 MB