You are here

Головна » BTF №1 2022

Productivity and slaughter rates of pigs when using a probiotic preparation

Probiotic feed additives in pig diets can be an alternative and highly effective way to solve a number of problems in industrial pig production. In the course of the studies, it was revealed that different conditions for the use of a probiotic preparation for suckling piglets cause changes in the productivity of young animals in their further cultivation. The probiotic preparation "Probiol ENZIM Feeds" was studied in two ways of feeding suckling piglets: soluble (125 g/ m3) and loose (250 g/t) in summer and winter periods. It was found that in the summer period the best growth rates were in animals treated with the probiotic preparation "Probiol ENZIM Feeds" in electrolyte-soluble form, and in winter - with feed in the amount of 0,25 kg/t. The best fattening properties during the growing period were found in pigs that received a probiotic preparation in loose form during the suckling period. In particular, when using a new feeding factor in a soluble form in the summer period, it is possible to achieve an increase in the live weight of piglets at weaning by 6,8%, gross gain - by 7,4%, average daily - by 10,6%. In winter, the best results were obtained when using a probiotic in loose form, where an increase in live weight occurred by 11,1%, gross growth - by 12,6% and average daily growth - by 17,7%. During the growing period, young pigs of the first experimental group had 6,8 g greater average daily gains; in the winter period of our research, pigs that received a probiotic preparation with feed during the suckling period reached slaughter conditions 3 days faster. The carcasses of pigs that received a probiotic preparation with feed during the lactation period were 2,07% heavier, the slaughter yield was 1,3% higher, and the fat thickness was 3,37 mm more. When using the loose method of feeding a new feeding factor for suckling piglets, it is possible to increase the yield of fat from the carcass and increase the meatiness of the carcass by 2,41%. Calculations have proved that when using Probiol ENZIM Feeds with feeding for suckling piglets, it is possible to achieve an increase in the profitability of pork production by 2,86 hryvnia / hryvnia. expenses.

Key words: probiotic preparation, feeding, young pigs, large white breed, productivity, economic efficiency.

 

TSARUK L. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-2546


  1. Chudak, R. A., Poberezhets, Yu.M., Ushakov, V.M., Babkov, Ya.I. (2021). Vplyv kormovykh dobavok ta kombikormiv na produktyvnist ta yakist miasa u svynei: monohrafiia [The impact of feed additives and animal feed on the productivity and quality of meat in pigs: monograph]. Vinnytsia: VNAU, 202 р.
  2. Chudak, R.A., Ohorodnichuk, H. M., Balukh, N. M. (2016). Efektyvnist vykorystannia kombinovanykh fermentno-probiotychnykh dobavok u hodivli silskohospodarskykh tvaryn: monohrafiia [The effectiveness of the use of combined enzyme-probiotic supplements in the feeding of farm animals: monograph]. Vinnytsia: VNAU, 143 р.
  3. Bondarenko L.V. (2020). Klitynnyi zakhyst orhanizmu vidluchenykh porosiat za dii probiotyka. [Klitinny zahist to the organism of irradiated piglets for di probiotics]. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva [Technology of production and processing of products]. Bila Tserkva: BNAU, no. 2. pp. 111–119. DOI:10.33245/2310-9289-2020-158-2-111-119
  4. Biriukova, I. (2019). Efektyvnyi probiotyk mozhe staty uspishnoiu alternatyvoiu antybiotykam i ne tilky [An effective probiotic can be a successful alternative to antibiotics and more]. The Ukrainian Farmer.
  5. Batista, A., Silva, M., Raices, R. (2015). Quality parameters of probiotic yogurt added to glucose oxidase compared to commercial products through microbiological, physical–chemical and metabolic activity analyses. Food Res. Int. Vol. 77, pp. 627–635.
  6. Shirobokov, V. P., Jankovs'kij, D. S., Diment, G. S. (2010). Novі strategіі v oblastі stvorennja і klіnіchnogo vikoristannja probіotikіv [New strategies in the field of creation and clinical use of probiotics]. Vіsn. farmakologіі ta farmacіі [Bulletin of Pharmacology and Pharmacy]. no. 2, pp. 18–30.
  7. Kanmani, P., Satish, Kumar R., Yuvaraj, N. (2013). Probiotics and its functionally valuable products – A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. Vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 641–658.
  8. Malyna, V.V., Bondarenko, L.V., Liasota, V.P., Hryshko, V.A., Balatskyi, Yu.O. (2017). Perspektyvy zastosuvannia probiotychnykh ta fermentnykh preparativ u svynarstvi: monohrafiia [Prospects for the use of probiotic and enzyme preparations in pig breeding: monograph]. Bila Tserkva, 243 p.
  9. Kuzmenko, O., Bomko, V., Horchanok, А., Cherniavskyi, O., Malina, V., Lytvyshchenko, L., Umanets, R., Zlamaniuk, L., Umanets, D., Porotikova, I. (2021). Influence of chelates on pigs productivity and quality. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 11 (2), pp. 268– 273. Available at:https://www.ujecology.com/articles/ influence-of-chelates-on-pigs-productivity-and-quality.pdf
  10. Bolokhovska, V.A., Bolokhovskyi, V.V., Bondarenko, L.V., Malyna, V.V., Liasota, V.P., Nikitenko, A.M., Naumchuk, V.V., Horbatiuk, O.I. (2010). Zastosuvannia probiotyka Protekto-aktyv u protsesi vyroshchuvannia molodniaku svynei [Probiotic infusion Protecto-active in the process of growing young pigs]. Bila Tserkva, 37 p.
  11. Bondarenko, V.V., Hutsol, A.V. (2016). Pokaznyky yakosti svynyny pry zghodovuvanni BVMD «Minaktyvit» [Indicators of pork quality during feeding BVMD "Minaktivit"]. Ahrarna nauka ta kharchovi tekhnolohii: zbirnyk naukovykh prats [Agricultural science and food technology: a collection of scientific papers]. Hodivlia tvaryn ta tekhnolohiia kormiv [Animal feeding and feed technology]. Vinnytsia: VNAU, Issue 2(92), pp. 16–21.
  12. Bondarenko, V.V. (2017). Vplyv zghodovuvannia BVMD «Minaktyvit» na strukturu shlunkovo-kyshkovoho traktu molodniaku svynei [Influence of feeding BVMD "Minactivit" on the structure of the gastrointestinal tract of young pigs]. Naukovyi zbirnyk LNUVMiB im. S.Z. Hzhytskoho [Scientific collection LNUVMiB named after S.Z. Gzhitsky]. Issue 2 (67). pp. 12–19.
  13. Machula, O.S. (2017). Rezystentnist i produktyvni yakosti porosiat pry vykorystanni preparativ RBS ta imunolak [Resistance and productive capacity of piglets with vicarious preparations of RBS and imunolak`1]. Biolohichni aspekty tekhnolohii tvarynnytstva i vyrobnytstva produktsii: materialy IV mizh nar. naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii. [Biological aspects of livestock breeding and production technologies: materials IV between Nar. scientific and practical conference]. Mykolaiv, pp. 5–15.
  14. Korostelevaб V.P. (2016). Sorbent «Fytosorb», probyotyky «Spas» y «Эnterosporyn» dlia profylaktyky mykotoksykozov zhyvotnыkh [Sorbent "Fitosorb", probiotics "Spas" and "Enterosporin" for the prevention of animal mycotoxicosis»/ Veterynarnyi vrach [Veterinarian]. no. 5, pp. 3–8.
  15. Pentyliuk, R.S. (2020). Statevi vidminnosti produktyvnosti porosiat pry zghodovuvanni preparatu Biomos: mater. naukovo-prakt. konf., Orhanizatsiia s.-h. Vyrobnytstva [Gender differences in the productivity of piglets when feeding Biomos: mater. scientific and practical. conf., Organization of agricultural-x. production]. Kherson State Agrarian University. pp. 34–35.
  16. Blaida, I.M. (2018). Vykorystannia probiotychnoi kormovoi dobavky «PROPIHplv» u hodivli svynomatok, remontnoho ta vidhodivelnoho molodniaku svynei: dys. … kand. s.-h. nauk [The use of probiotic feed additive "PROPIGplv" in the feeding of sows, rearing and fattening pigs: dis. … cand. s.-g. sciences]. LNUVMiB named after S.Z. Gzhitsky. Lviv, 140 p.
  17. Biliavtseva, V.V. (2016). Yakist svynyny pry zghodovuvanni BMVD «Enervik» z karnitynom [The quality of pork when feeding BMVD "Enervik" with punitive mud]. Naukovyi visnyk LNUVMBT im. S.Z. Hzhytskoho [Scientific Bulletin of LNUVMBT named after S.Z. Gzyckyi]. Lviv, Vol. 18, no. 2(67), pp. 8–13.
  18. Moshkutelo Y.Y., Aleksandrov P.V., Severyn V.P y dr. (2012). Pro-prebyotycheskye preparatы PDK, «Byotek» v systeme vыrashchyvanyia y otkorma molodniaka svynei [Pro-prebiotic preparations PDK, "Biotek" in the system of rearing and fattening young pigs]. Svynovodstvo. [Pig breeding]. no. 2. pp. 64–67.
  19. Zhila, M. І., Levic'kij, T. R., Kushnіr, І. M. (2014). Farmakologіchnі vlastivostі probіotichnih kormovih dobavok ta їh vpliv na produktivnіst' porosjat pri vіdgodіvlі [Pharmacological properties of probiotic feed additives and their effect on the productivity of piglets during fattening]. Naukovo-tehnіchnij bjuleten' Іnstitutu bіologії tvarin, DNDKІ vetpreparatіv ta kormovih dobavok [Scientific and technical bulletin of the Institute of Animal Biology, DNDKI veterinary drugs and feed additives]. Lvіv, Issue 15, no. 1, pp. 158–163.
  20. Stojanovs'kij, V.G. (2011). Probіotiki ta іmunna sistema [Probiotics and the immune system]. Veterinarіja [Veterinary medicine]. no. 4 (101), pp. 21–25.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon tsaruk_1_2022.pdf403.11 KB
BTF №1 2022