You are here

PRODUCTIVITY OF RABBITS AND BALANCE OF CALCIUM AND PHOSPHORUS IN THEIR BODY BY FEEDING DIFFERENT SOURCES OF SELENIUM

Download this article: 
Annotation: 

The analysis of literary sources testifies to insufficient content of Selenium in forage. Therefore some extra Selenium-containing compounds have to be added to the rabbits’ diet so that the desired rate of Selenium could be reached. The data, received from in-vivo research showed that of all used sources of Selenium (sodium selenite, sodium selenate, selenomethionine and Sel-Plex) the most effective for young rabbits was Sel-Plex. Inclusion of Sel-Plex into diet to reach Selenium level 0,2 mg/kg of dry matter led to the live weight increase of experimental rabbits by 4,7 % with a simultaneous decrease by 2,9 % of ra feed portion per 1 kg of body weight increase. Using Sel-Plex instead of sodium selenite for young rabbits leads to a tendency to increase the absorption of Calcium and Phosphorus into the rabbits body. The use of inorganic   Selenium salts, as compared with organic, has a less positive influence on the productivity of rabbits.

Key words: Selenium, Calcium, Phosphorus, rabbit, productivity, sodium selenite, sodium selenate, selenomethionine, Sel-Plex, live weight, feed.

Reference: 

1. Vikoristannja selenu v roslinnictvі ta tvarinnictvі / І.І. Іbatullіn, V.A. Veshic'kij, V.V. Otchenashko. – K.: Fenіks, 2004. – 208 s.

2. Selen v pitanii: rastenie, zhivotnye, chelovek / Pod red. N.A. Golubkinoj, T.T. Papazjana. – Moskva, 2006. – 254 s.

3. Surai Peter F. Selenium in nutrition and health / Peter F. Surai. – Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 2007. – 974 p.

4. Schrauzer G. Selenium yeast: composition, quality, analysis, and safety / G. Schrauzer // Pure Appl Chem, 2006. – Vol.78. – P. 105-109.

5. The impact of forage additive Sel-Plex containing organic selenium (Se) on morphological and biochemical blood parameters and activity enzymes GPx and δ-ALRD in fattening pigs / Sarkuniene C., Oberauskas V., Baranauskiene D. et al. // Vet Med Zoot, 2010. – Vol. 50. – P. 88-92.