You are here

Sanitary and hygienic condition of the microclimate parameters of the premises of light-frame and reconstructed cowsheds in the spring with loose housing of the dairy herd

A comparative evaluation of the main parameters of the air microclimate for the maintenance of a dairy herd of cows in the reconstructed and light frame cowsheds in the spring was carried out. It was found that the average daily air temperature in the cowshed of light frame type of metal structures in the spring ranged from 5.48 to 16.42 ° C. Relative humidity in the spring ranged from 67.32 (third decade, at 12 o'clock) to 72.54% (at 6 o'clock in the morning in the first decade of research). Air velocities during the study period ranged on average from 0.29 (first decade at 15th hour) to 0.52 m/s (at 18 o’clock in the second decade of the study). On average, during the first, second and third decades, the level of natural light in the light frame cowshed was: 1981.05; 1942.72 and 2414.89 lux. In the reconstructed cowshed for the period of researches the lowest air temperature (° С) was fixed at the beginning of research as of 6 o'clock in the morning - 6,28 ° С, and the highest for the third decade - 17,86 ° С, at 15 o'clock. The relative humidity ranged from 67.74 to 74.12% (at 6 a.m. in the first decade of the study). The air velocity ranged from 0.39 to 0.42 m/s. The average rate of acceleration of air movement for the first, second and third decades was, respectively: 0.35; 0.41 and 0.34 m/s. The difference between the highest average (second decade) and the lowest (third decade) was 20.58%. In the reconstructed cowshed, the lowest indicator of natural light was recorded at the beginning of the research in the first decade at 6 o'clock in the morning - 1245.38 lux, and the highest in the third decade - 2481.51 lux, at 15 o'clock. On average for the first, second and third decades, the level of natural light in the reconstructed barn, respectively, was: 2000.06; 2075.15 and 2236.74 lux. It is established that the formation of the parameters of the air microclimate both in the room as a whole and in some of its individual parts is influenced by a number of factors, both external and internal. As a result, it was concluded that the parameters of the air microclimate in both cowsheds, although they had some differences, but in general met the established hygienic standards.

Key words: microclimate parameters, air temperature, relative humidity, air movement, natural light, light frame cowshed, reconstructed cowshed, spring period, loose boxes of the dairy herd.

  1. Shkromada, O. (2019). Improvement of milk quality for micro-climate formation on cattle farms. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. Veterinary Medicine. Vol. 4 (47), pp. 43–49.
  2. Kudrin, M.R., Yzhboldyna, S.N. (2011). Options microclimate at raznoe technology сontent cows. Chief zootehnyk. Vol. 10, pp. 23–28.
  3. Vasilenko, T., Milostiviy, R., Kalinichenko, A., Milostiva, D. (2018). Heat stress in dairy cows in the central part of Ukraine and its economic consequences. Social and economic aspects of sustainable development of regions: monograph. Opole. pp. 128–135.
  4. Barylovychб O. M. (2013). Stan, problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku molochnogo skotarstva [Status, problems and prospects of dairy farming development]. Naukovyj visnyk Nacional'nogo universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannja Ukrai'ny [Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine]. Ekonomika, agrarnyj menedzhment, biznes [Economics, agricultural management, business]. Kyiv, no. 181(6), pp. 64–69.
  5. Vysokos, M.P., Mylostyvyj, R.V., Tjupyna, N.V., Kalynychenko, A.O. (2015). Zoogigijenichna ocinka umov utrymannja molochnogo gurtu golshtyns'koi' hudoby za parametramy mikroklimatu monobloku korivnyka v regioni Prydniprov’ja [Zoohygienic assessment of the conditions of keeping a Holstein cattle dairy group according to the parameters of the microclimate of a cowshed monoblock in the Dnieper region]. Naukovo-tehnichnyj bjuleten' Naukovo[1]doslidnogo centru biobezpeky ta ekologichnogo kontrolju resursiv APK [Scientific and technical bulletin of the Research Center for Biosafety and Environmental Control of Agricultural Resources]. Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 74–78.
  6. Lucenko, M. M., Ivanyshyn, V.V., Smoljar, V.I. (2006). Perspektyvni tehnologii' vyrobnyctva moloka: monografija [Promising technologies of milk production: monograph]. Kyiv: Academy, 192 p.
  7. Mylostyvyj, R.V., Vysokos, M.P., Pryluckaja, E.V., Tyhonenko, V.A. (2016). Meropryjatyja po stabylyzacyy mykroklymata v zhyvotnovodcheskyh pomeshhenyjah v zharkyh pogodnuh uslovyjah [Measures to stabilize the microclimate in livestock facilities in hot weather]. Pryorytetnue y ynnovacyonnue tehnologyy v zhyvotnovodstve – osnova modernyzacyy agropromyshlennogo kompleksa Rossyy: cb. nauch. Statej [Priority and innovative technologies in animal husbandry - the basis of modernization of the agro-industrial complex of Russia: cb. scientific articles]. Stavropol, pp. 291–295.
  8. Prokopenko, P. S. (1999). Optymizacija mikroklimatu korivnykiv [Optimization of the microclimate of cowsheds]. Tavr. nauk. Visn [Taurus scientific bulletin]. Issue 11, Part 1, pp. 141–144.
  9. Fomenko, A. D. (2019). Ocinka stanu mikroklimatu v suchasnyh prymishhennjah polegshenoi' konstrukcii' [Assessment of the microclimate in modern premises of lightweight construction]. Teorija i praktyka rozvytku vivcharstva Ukrai'ny v umovah jevrointegracii': zb. materialiv IV mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Dnipro, 23–24 trav. 2019 r. ) [Theory and practice of sheep breeding development in Ukraine in terms of European integration: Coll. materials IV International. scientific-practical conf. (Dnipro, May 23-24, 2019)]. Dniprovsky DAEU. Dnipro: Jurfund, pp. 150−152.
  10. Karelin, A.I. (2000). Zoogigienicheskie osnovy projektirovanija, stroitel'stva i zkspluatacii zhivotnovodcheskih ob'ektov [Zoohygienic foundations of design, construction and operation of livestock facilities]. Moscow: Rosselkhozizdat, 370 p.
  11. Gavryljuk, O.I. (2017). Vplyv mikroklimatu korivnyka pry riznyh sposobah utrymannja na jakist' moloka koriv [The influence of the microclimate of the cowshed in different ways of keeping on the quality of milk of cows]. Visnyk Sums'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University]. pp. 48−50.
  12. Voloshhuk, V.M., Hocenko, A.V. (2017). Dynamika temperatury povitrja ta vnutrishnih elementiv konstrukcii' korivnyka karkasnogo typu za dii' faktoriv zovnishn'ogo seredovyshha [Dynamics of air temperature and internal structural elements of a frame-type cowshed under the influence of environmental factors]. Visnyk Sums'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University]. pp. 37−41.
  13. Shkromada, O.I. (2019). Pidvyshhennja jakosti moloka za rahunok formuvannja mikroklimatu na tvarynnyc'kyh fermah [Improving the quality of milk through the formation of a microclimate on livestock farms]. Visnyk Sums'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu: naukovyj zhurnal [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University: scientific journal]. Veterinary medicine. Sumy: SNAU, Issue 4 (47), pp. 44−49.
  14. Kondrasij, L.A., Jakubchak, O.M., Shevchenko, L.V. (2017). Algorytm implementacii' nalezhnoi' praktyky molochnogo fermerstva z metoju otrymannja bezpechnogo ta jakisnogo moloka-syrovyny [Algorithm for the implementation of good practice of dairy farming in order to obtain safe and high quality raw milk]. Naukovyj visnyk LNUVMB imeni S.Z. G'zhyc'kogo [Scientific Bulletin of LNUVMB named after S.Z. Gzhytskyi]. Vol. 19, no. 78, pp. 53−57.
  15. Kudlaj, I.M., Lucenko, M.M. (2010). Vplyv novyh ob'jemno-planuval'nyh rishen' rodyl'nogo viddilennja biotehnologichnogo kompleksu na umovy utrymannja telychok [Influence of new volume-planning decisions of the maternity ward of the biotechnological complex on the conditions of keeping heifers]. Naukovyj visnyk LNUVMBT im. Gzhyc'kogo [Scientific Bulletin of LNUVMB named after S.Z. Gzhytskyi]. Vol.12, no. 2 (44), pp. 107–111.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon gryshko_1_2021.pdf539.36 KB