You are here

Correction of calcium norms during the feeding day of laying-hens

Highdem and for eggs requires a significant increase in production volumes subject to the standards of their quality. One of the components of the egg providing its safety and quality is the shell, which accounts for about 10-12% mass of the egg. The formation of eggs in chickens is a complex process, which is carried out within 24-27 hours, from which about 17-20 hours is given to form the shell. Since the main number of eggs chickens are demolished in the first half of the day, most of the calcification period of the egg shel falls on the dark period of day when the chicken stops to eat. A study was conducted to in vestigate the influence of an increased dose of calcium in the form of limestone particles when feeding it in the afternoon on the productivity and quality of chicken eggs. For this, two groups of laying-hens were formed, the mix feed for which consisted of the same components of cereal and protein-vitamin feeds, but was distingueished by calcium content, namely: in the control group in the mix feed, which was fed both in the morning and in the afternoon, was 3,5% calcium in the form of limestone thin and coarse grinding. The chickens of the experimental group in the morning were fed by mix feed with a calcium content of 1.5%, and in the afternoon - with a calcium content of 7% in the form of coarse limestone. Based on the research, it was found that during the 30-week period of productivity, the survival of chickens in the experimental groups was the same. Chickens of the experimental group reached 95% egg production at the age of 186 days, which his 5 days before the control group. Egg production on the middle and initial laying-hens in the experimental group for the whole production period was 178,4 eggs and 173,3 eggs, which is 6,2 and 7,0 eggs more than in the control group. The feeding of the chickens of the experimental group in the afternoon of mix feeds with an elevated calcium content contributed to an increase in the mass of eggs by 1,7 g, the exit of the egg mass on the middle and the initial laying-hens on 0,66 and 0,7 kg, the number of food eggs categories XL and L on 0,5 and 5.4%, compared with the control group of chickens, which was fed both in the morning and in the afternoon, a mix feed containing 3,5% calcium in the form of limestone thin and coarse grinding.

Key words: laying-hens, mix feed, calcium, egg production, eggs mass, eggs quality.

  1. D'alba, L., Jones, D.N., Badawy, H.T., Eliason, C.M., Shawkey, M.D. (2014). Antimicrobial properties of a nanostructured eggshell from a compost-nesting bird. Journal of Experimental Biology. 217, pp. 1116–1121. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1242/jeb.098343.
  2. Encyclopedia. Egg as food. Available at:https:// en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Egg_as_food. (2012). Accessed on August 12, 2016.
  3. FAO. Egg facts. Animal production and nutrition (2015). Available at:http://www. fao.org/resources/ infographics/infographics-details/en/c/284410/. Accessed on August 12, 2016.
  4. Government of Alberta. Egg size and shape. Government of Alberta and © 1996-2006 Royal Alberta Museum (2016). Available at: http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/vexhibit/ eggs/ vexhome/sizeshap.htm.Accessed on June 2, 2016.
  5. Gupta, L., (2008). Maintaining Egg Shell Quality. ErişimAdresi: Available at: http://www. thepoultrysite.com/ articles/979/maintaining-egg-shell-quality.ErişimTarihi: 01.01.2019.
  6. Hetland, H., Svihus, B., Lervik, S., Moe, R. (2003). Effect of feed structure on performance and welfarein laying hens housed in conventional and furnished cages. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A-Animal Science. 53 (2), pp. 92–100. Available at: https:// doi. org/10.1080/09064700310002387
  7. Hoffman J.R, Falvo, M.J. (2004). Protein rating – which is best? Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 3, pp. 118–130. PMID: 24482589 PMCID: PMC3905294
  8. Hunton, P. (2005). Research on egg shell structure and quality: an historical overview. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola. 17, pp. 67–71. ISSN 1516-635X.
  9. Idahor, K.O., Yakubu, A., Egahi, J.O., Gwaza, D.S., Ahmadu, G.B., Thani, A.P. (2013). Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Cost Benefits of Four Broiler Strains on Restricted Feeding Regimen in North Central Nigeria. Journal of Animal Science Advances. 3, pp. 449–456. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5455/japa. 20130919074738
  10. Idahor, K.O., Akinola, L.A.F., Chia, S.S. (2015). Sex predetermination in fowl using some egg parameters in north central Nigeria. Journal of Animal Science Advances. 5, pp. 1171–1176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5455/ jasa.201501090 13553
  11. Idahor, K.O. (2017). Poultry Birds’ Egg: An Egg inside Egg whose Biological, Nutritional and Cultural Value Gives and Sustains Life. International Journal of Research Studies in Zoology. 3 (4), 10 p. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.20431/2454-941X.0304001.
  12. Jacob, J. P., Miles, R. D., Mather, F. B. (2000). Egg quality. Cooperative Extension Service, Institute ofFood and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). University of Florida PS, 24 p.
  13. Keshavarz, K. (1998). Investigation on the possibility of reducing protein, phosphorus, and calcium requirements of laying hens by manipulation of time of access to these nutrients. Poultryscience. 77 (9), pp. 1320–1332. Available at: https://doi.org/10,1093/ps/77.9.1320.
  14. Molnár, A., Maertens, L., Ampe, B., Buyse, J., Zoons, J., Delezie, E. (2018). Effect of different split-feeding treatments on performance, egg quality, and bone quality of individually housed aged laying hens." Poultry science. 97, no. 1, pp. 88–101. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.3382/ps/ pex255.
  15. Nys, Y., Gautron, J., Garcia-Ruiz, J.M., Hincke, M.T. (2004). Avian eggshell mineralization: biochemical and functional characterization of matrix proteins. Comptes Rendus Palevol. 3 (6-7), pp. 549–562. Available at:https:// doi.org/ 10.1016/j.crpv.2004.08.002.
  16. Rodríguez-Navarro, A.B., Domínguez-Gasca, N., Muñoz, A., Ortega-Huertas, M. (2013). Change in the chicken eggshell cuticle with hen age and egg freshness. Poultry Science. 92, pp. 3026–3035. Available at: https://doi. org/10.3382/ ps.2013-03230.
  17. Saunders-Blades, J.L., MacIsaac, J.L., Korver, D.R., Anderson, D.M. (2009). The effect of calcium source and particle size on the production performance and bone quality of laying hens. Poultry Sc. Vol. 88, no. 2. pp. 338–353. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00278.
  18. Thear, K. (2005). Eggshell colour. Broad. Leys Publishing Ltd. © 2004-2011. London.
  19. Tůmová, E., Ledvinka, Z. (2009). The effect of time of oviposition and age on egg weight, egg components weight and eggshell quality. Arch. Geflügelk. 73, pp. 110–115.
  20. Waldroup, P., Hellwig, H. (2000). The potential value of morning and afternoon feeds for laying hens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 9 (1), pp. 98–110. Available at:https:// doi.org/10.1093/japr/9.1.98.
  21. Yalçn, S., Eser, H., Onbaşılar, İ., Yalçın, S., Oğuz, F.K. (2016). Effects of dietary sepiolite on performance, egg quality and some blood parameters in laying hens. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 63, pp. 25–29. Available at:https://abs.ankara.edu. tr/sakine-yalcin
AttachmentSize
PDF icon karkach_1_2021_compressed.pdf196.4 KB