You are here

Головна » 2020 » BTF №1 2020

The fi sh-biological assessment of carps hybrids of Ukrainian selection in the fi rst year of life

It was made the fi sh-biological assessment of yearlings carp hybrids obtained as a result of crossings of the Nivkovsky plant line of the small-scaled internal breed type of the Ukrainian Ramov breed and the Nivkovsky internal breed type of the Ukrainian scaly breed. The studies were carried out on the basis of the Institute of Fisheriesdepartment of the NAAS, Ukraine "Nivki", TOV "Skvirapleribribosp" and the laboratory of the Department of Production and Processing of Fish Products of the Belotserkovsky NAU according to practical standard in fi sh farming. As a control group, there were used carps of the Nivkovsky internal breed of Ukrainian scaly breed, with a total planting density of 30 thousand specimens. / ha. The research ponds were stocked with three-day larvae in early June. According to the content of the main cations and anions, nutrients and organic matter, the water of the research reservoirs of the Squirapleribribosp Ltd. for the period of the experiment corresponded to the existing standards. The quantitative and qualitative values of the indicators of the natural forage base were at the level of requirements for intensive rearing of young carp in pond farms. The growth rate of yearlings of the control group until the end of July was slightly higher than the studied group of carps hybrids by the average population values of the body mass index. The average body weight of yearlings in the control pond with the origin of LF * LF was at the moment of the experiment 7.3 ± 0.5 g, for carps of the origin of LF * NMF - 6.8 ± 0.6 g. At the end of September, the value for this indicator was at the level of 25.5 ± 1.6 g and 27.0 ± 2.0 g, respectively, for the control and the group of crossbreeds. The indices of heterosis in yearlings of carps hybrids had positive values accordance with all fi sh and biological indicators relative to their parental forms: by average weight - 106.7%, output - 111.5%, and fi sh production - 118.1%. It was established that a mixture of carps of the NCHK * NMK group have high cold resistance and winter hardiness, which are characteristic of the parent form of the Nivka lowscale carps.

Key words: carp, breeding, Nivkovsky scaly, Nivkovsky scaly, yearlings, heterosis index, fi sh-biological indicators, winter hardiness.

OLESHKO M. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8078-4735


BEKH V. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-815X


OLESHKO O. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-0861


GEIKO L. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-5006


  1. Beh V.V., Gricinyak I.I., Oleksiyenko O.O., Osipenko M.I. Perspektivi selekcijno-pleminnoyi spravi u ribnictvi Ukrayini. Visnik agrarnoyi nauki. 2014. S. 31–34. URL: https://scholar.google.com.ua/citations?user=bRQMrSwAAAAJ&hl=ru.
  2. Luo, K., Wang, S., Fu, Y., Zhou, P., Huang, X., Gu, Q., Li, W., Wang, Y., Hu, F., Liu, S. (2019). Rapid genomic DNA variation in newly hybridized carp lineages derived from Cyprinus carpio (♀) × Megalobrama amblycephala (♂). BMC Genet. 28, 20(1), 87 p. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1186/ s12863-019-0784-2.
  3. FAO (2016). FishStat Database. Available at: http:// faostat.fao.org/site/629/default.Aspx.
  4. Janssen, K., Chavanne, H., Berentsen, P., and Komen, H. (2017). Impact of selective breeding on European aquaculture. Aquaculture. 472, pp. 8–16. Available at: https/doi. org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.03.012.
  5. Nielsen, H. M., Ødegård, J., Olesen, I., Gjerde, B., Ardo, L., Jeney, G. (2010). Genetic analysis of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains. I: genetic parameters and heterosis for growth traits and survival. Aquaculture. 304, pp. 14–21. Available at: https/doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.016.
  6. Chavanne, H., Janssen, K., Hofherr, J., Contini, F., Haff ray, P., Komen, H., et al. (2016). A comprehensive survey on selective breeding programs and seed market in the European aquaculture fi sh industry. Aquacult. Int. 24, pp. 1287–1307. Available at: https/doi.org/10.1007/s10499-016- 9985-0.
  7. Kocour, M., Mauger, S., Rodina, M., Gela, D., Linhart, O., Vandeputte, M. (2007). Heritability estimates for processing and quality traits in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) using a molecular pedigree. Aquaculture. 270, pp. 43–50. Available at: https/doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.03.001.
  8. Ninh, N.H., Ponzoni, R. W., Nguyen, N. H., Woolliams, J. A., Taggart, J. B., McAndrew, B. J. (2011). A comparison of communal and separate rearing of families in selective breeding of common carp (Cyprinus carpio): estimation of genetic parameters. Aquaculture. 32, pp. 39–46. Available at:https/doi.org/ 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.09.031.
  9. Dong, Z., Nguyen, N. H., Zhu, W. (2015). Genetic evaluation of a selective breeding program for common carp Cyprinus carpio conducted from 2004 to 2014. BMC Genet. 16, 94 p. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015- 0256-2.
  10. Hu, X., Li, C., Shang, M., Ge, Y., Jia, Z., Wang, S. (2017). Inheritance of growth traits in Songpu mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) cultured in Northeast China. Aquaculture. 477, pp. 1–5. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.04.031.
  11. Prchal, M., Kause, A., Vandeputte, M., Gela, D., Allamelou, J. M., Girish, K. (2018). The genetics of overwintering performance in two-year old common carp and its relation to performance until market size. PLoS One 13:e0191624. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191624.
  12. Prchal, M., Bugeon, J., Vandeputte, M., Kause, A., Vergnet, A., Zhao, J., Gela, D., Genestout, L., Bestin, A., Haff ray, P., and Kocour M. (2018). Potential for Genetic Improvement of the Main Slaughter Yields in Common Carp With in vivo Morphological Predictors. Front. Genet. 9:2, 83 p. Available at:https/doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00283.
  13. Md., Monirul, Islam, Abdulla-Al-Asif, Md., and Ruhul, Amin. The Induced Breeding of Common Carps (Cyprinus carpio) in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Science. 2016, 23(84), pp. 619–632. Available at:https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/308090061_The_induced_breeding_of_commo... Bangladesh.
  14. Tamás, Sza., Béla, Urbányi., Tamás, Müller., Róbert, Szabó., László, Horváth. (2019). Assessment of induced breeding of major Chinese carps at a large-scale hatchery in Hungary. Aquaculture Reports. Vol. 14, 100193. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2019.100193.
  15. Gergo, Gyalog., Judit, Oláh., Emese, Békefi., Mónika, Lukácsik., József, Popp. (2017). Constraining Factors in Hungarian Carp Farming: An Econometric Perspective Sustainability. 9, 2111. Available at:https/doi.org/10.3390/ su9112111.
  16. Kniga, M.V., Tarazevich, E.V., Sazanov, V.B. (2012). Shema selekcіі novoі dzerkal'noі bіlorus'koі  porodi koropa [Scheme of selection of a new mirror Belarusian carp breed]. Ribogospodars'ka nauka Ukraini [Fisheries science of Ukraine]. no. 2, pp. 94–98. Available at:http://fsu.ua/index.php/uk/2012/2-2012-20/2012-02- 094-098.
  17. Kniga, M.V., Shejko, Ja.I., Vashkevich, L.M. (2016). Sravnitel'naja harakteristika rybovodno-biologicheskih pokazatelej ishodnogo selekcionnogo genofonda belorusskoj zerkal'noj porody karpa [Comparative characteristics of fi sh and biological indicators of the initial breeding gene pool of the Belarusian mirror breed of carp]. Voprosy ribnogo hazjajstva Belarusi [Issues of ribovy economy of Belarus]. no. 32, pp. 52–61.
  18. Mohammad, Mustafi zur Rahman. (2015). Role of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) in aquaculture production systems. Frontiers in Life Science. 8:4, pp. 399–410. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2015.1045629.
  19. Kim, JE., Goo, IB., Hwang, JA., Kim, HS., Choi, HS., Lee, JH. (2018). Genetic variability comparison of cultured Israeli carp (Cyprinus carpio) from Korea using microsatellites. Genes Genomics. 40(6), pp. 635–642. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0663-7. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
  20. Ju-ae, Hwang., In, Bon Goo., Jung, Eun Kim., Myung, Hun Kim., Do, Hee Kim., Jae, Hyun Im., Hye-Sung, Choi., Jeong-Ho, Lee. (2016). Growth Comparison of Israeli Carp (Cyprinus carpio) to Diff erent Breeding Combination. Dev Reprod. 20(4), pp. 275–281. Available at:https/doi. org/10.12717/DR.2016.20.4.275.
  21. Alexander, M. Kaminski., Froukje, Kruijssen., Steven, M. Cole. (2020). A review of inclusive business models and their application in aquaculture development. Reviews in Aquaculture. pp. 1–22. Available at:https/doi.org/10.1111/ raq.12415.
  22. Md. Abdul, Wahab., Md. Jimi, Reza., Mir, Mohammad Ali., Md. Nahiduzzaman., Michael, J. Phillips. (2019). The Potential for Homestead Pond Polyculture of Tilapia and Carps in Coastal Bangladesh. Journal of Fisheries Science. Vol. 1, Issue 1. Available at:https://doi.org/10.30564/jfs. v1i1.882.
  23. Beh, V.V., Tomilenko, V.G., Kucherenko, A.P. (1998). Іnstrukcіja z promislovogo shreshhuvannja koropіv ukraіns'koі ramchastoі ta rumuns'koі ramchastoі porodi fresinet [Instruction on industrial crossing of carp of Ukrainian frame and Romanian frame breed fresinet]. Іnstitut ribnogo gospodarstva UAAN [Institute of Fisheries UAAS]. K., 12 p.
  24. Krazhan, S.A., Litvinova, T.G. (1997). Prirodna kormova baza viroshhuval'nih ta nagul'nih stavіv і shljahi іі pokrashhennja [Natural fodder base of growing and feeding ponds and ways to improve it]. Metodichnі rekomendacіі [Guidelines]. K., 50 p.
  25. Agatova A.I., Naletova I.A., Zubarevich V.L. (1991). Spravochnik gidrohimika: rybnoe hozjajstvo / pod red. V.V. Sapozhnikova [Handbook of hydrochemist: fi sheries / ed. V.V. Sapozhnikova]. M.: Agropromizdat, 224 p.
  26. Svechyn, K. B. (1967). Otsenka eff ektyvnosty heterozysa v otnosytelnykh pokazateliakh [Evaluation of the effectiveness of heterosis in relative terms] Zhyvotnovodstvo [Livestock]. 1, pp. 61–62.
  27. Lakin, G.F. (1990). Biometrija [Biometrics]. M .: Higher school, 352 p.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon oleshkobekh_1_2020.pdf2.8 MB
2020
BTF №1 2020