You are here

Ergonomic and economic indicators of milk production using different cow milking technologies

The purpose of this work was to study the effect of changing the way of keeping and milking equipment on ergonomic and economic indicators. The research was carried out at «Ostriykivske» LLC, Bilotserkivskyi district, Kyiv region, where the milking herd was transferred from a capital-type room with tethered housing and milking into the milk pipeline to an easy-to-assemble room with loose housing and milking in the milking
hall at the «Carousel» plant. The material for the research was lactating cows of the Ukrainian black-spotted dairy breed of II and III lactations. In order to accurately determine the duration of the technological operations of the milking process through the milk pipe and at the «Carousel» milking plant, it was filmed during the morning milking of cows. The change in the method of keeping (from tethered to loose housing) and the milking option (in the stall to the milk pipeline to the milking hall) had a significant impact on the time spent when performing the technological operations of one cow milking. The total time spent by machine milking operators in the slope decreased by 31.35 seconds. When moving the animals to the milking parlor, the duration of such operations as washing, wiping and massaging of the udder decreased by 4.8 s, milking of the first trickles of milk – by 0.6 s, and putting milking cups on the udders – by 1.3 s. The duration of preparatory and final milking operations decreased by 7.2 seconds, and other operations related to milking decreased by 58.2 seconds. At the same time, the complex indicator of the ergonomics of the milking installation when transferring cows to the milking parlor increased significantly (by 0.60) and met the requirements of the standard. The total labor costs when the conditions of keeping and milking were changed decreased by 52.96 man hours/year per cow. Labor costs for the following types of work decreased most significantly: milking and primary processing of milk; cleaning of stalls and manure passages; making litter and operating costs: 22.00; 19.40; 2.60 and 6.60 man hours/year per cow, respectively. Electricity consumption per cow per year increased by 22 kWh, and water for the milking process increased by 560 liters.

 Key words: dairy cows, ergonomics of milking, change of housing conditions, milking facilities, consumption of energy resources.

 

  1. Ruban, S. Yu., Borshch, O. V., Borshch, O. O. (2017). Suchasni tekhnolohiyi vyrobnytstva moloka. (osoblyvosti ekspluatatsiyi, tekhnolohichni rishennya, eskizni proekty) [Modern milk production technologies. (peculiarities of operation, technological decisions, sketch designs)]. Kharkiv: STYLIZDAT, 172 p. (in Ukrainian).
  2. Ruban, S., Borshch, O. O., Borshch, O. V., Orischuk, O., Balatskiy, Y., Fedorchenko, M., Kachan, A., Zlochevskiy, M. (2020). The impact of high temperatures on respiration rate, breathing condition and productivity of dairy cows in different production systems. Animal Science Papers and Reports, Vol. 38, no. l, pp. 61–72. Available at:https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/ 20203167447.
  3. Borshch, O. O., Borshch, O. V., Donchenko, T. A., Kosior, L. T., Pirova, L. V. (2017). Influence of low temperatures on behavior, productivity and bioenergy parameters of dairy cows kept in cubicle stalls and deep litter system. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 73–77. DOI:10.15421/2017_51.
  4. Fedota, O., Puzik, N., Skrypkina, I., Babalyan, V., Mitiohlo, L., Ruban, S., Belyaev, S., Borshch, O.O., Borshch, O.V. (2022). Single nucleotide polymorphism C994g of the cytochrome P450 gene possess pleiotropic effects in Bos taurus, L. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, Vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 7–15. DOI:10.14232/ abs.2022.1.7-15.
  5. Borshch, O. O., Borshch, O. V. (2022). The influence of changing conditions for keeping and cows’ milking on their behavior, productivity and condition. Research for Rural Development. Vol. 37, pp. 7–12. DOI:10.22616/rrd.28.2022.001.
  6. Ruban, S., Danshyn, V., Matvieiev, M., Borshch, O.O., Borshch, O.V., Korol-Bezpala, L. (2022). Characteristics of lactation curve and reproduction in dairy cattle. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. Vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 373–381.
  7. Broucek, J., Uhrincat, M., Mihina, S., Soch, M., Mrekajova, A., Hanus, A. (2017). Dairy Cows Produce Less Milk and Modify Their Behaviour during the Transition between Tie-Stall to Free-Stall. Animals, Vol. 7, no. 16. DOI:10.3390/ani7030016.
  8. Cook, N. B. (2020). Symposium review: The impact of management and facilities on cow culling rates. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 103, pp. 3846–3855. DOI:10.3168/jds.2019-17140.
  9. Pavlenko, A., Lidfors, L., Arney, D.R., Kaart, T., Aland, A. (2018). Behavior and Performance of Dairy Cows after Transfer from Tied to Cubicle Housing. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 82–92. DOI:10.1080/10888705.20 17.1376204.
  10. Sitkowska, B., Piwczyński, D., Aerts, J., Waś- kowicz, M. (2015). Changes in milking parameters with robotic milking. Archive Animal Breeding. Vol. 58, pp. 137–143. DOI: 10.5194/aab-58-137-2015.
  11. Angrecka, S., Herbut, P. (2016). Impact of barn orientation on insolation and temperature of stalls surface. Annals of Animal Science, Vol. 16, pp. 887–896. DOI:10.1515/aoas-2015-0096.
  12. Ding, T., Sun, B., Shi, Z., Li, B. (2019). Optimizing Water Droplet Diameter of Spray Cooling for Dairy Cow in Summer Based on Enthalpy Difference Theory. Energies, Vol. 12. Article number: 3637. DOI:10.3390/ en12193637.
  13. Lovarelli, D., Finzi, A., Mattachini, G., Riva, E. (2020). A Survey of Dairy Cattle Behavior in Different Barns in Northern Italy. Animals, Vol. 10. Article number: 713. DOI:10. 3390/ani10040713.
  14. Jakob, M. C. (2019). Evaluation of a Physical Ergonomic Intervention for Milking Parlor Operatives – A Case Study. Journal of Agromedicine, Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 215–223. DOI:10.1080/ 1059924X.2019.1590270.
  15. Braun, L., Terhorst, Y., Titzler, I., Freund, J., Thielecke, J., Ebert, D.D., Baumeister, H. (2022). Lessons Learned from an Attempted Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Improvement of Chronic Pain-Associated Disability in Green Professions: Long-Term Effectiveness of a Guided Online-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (PACT-A). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19. Article number: 13858. DOI: 10.3390/ ijerph192113858.
  16. Edwards, J. P., Kuhn-Sherlock, B. (2021). Opportunities for improving the safety of dairy parlor workers. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 419–430. DOI:10.3168/jds.2020-18954.
  17. Karimi, A., Dianat, I., Barkhordari, A., Yusefzade, I., Rohani-Rasaf, M. (2020). A multicomponent ergonomic intervention involving individual and organisational changes for improving musculoskeletal outcomes and exposure risks among dairy workers. Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 88, 103159 p. DOI:10.1016/j. apergo.2020.103159.
  18. Anjuly, S., Singh, T., Suryendra, S. (2020). Use of Improved tool (Revolving Pihri) for milking of dairy animals by farm women. Journal of Community Mobilization and Sustainable Development, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 92–94. Available at:https://www.researchgate.net/ profile/ Anannya-Chakraborty/publication/44431954_ community_mob_hunger_and_voice/ links/5f74933d- 458515b7cf59597c/community-mob-hunger-and-voice. pdf#page=98.
  19. Gurnani, U., Singh, S. K., Sain, M. K., Meena, M. L. (2022). Ergonomic Analysis of Manual Activities Among Dairy Farm Workers: A Literature Review. Ergonomics for Design and Innovation. Conference paper. Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 391). pp. 661–673. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-94277-9_57.
  20. Cockburn, M., Gómez, Y., Schick, M., Maffiuletti, N. A., Gygax, L., Savary, P., Umstätter, C. (2019). Effect of milking stall dimensions on upper limb and shoulder muscle activity in milkers. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 4563–4576. DOI:10.3168/ jds. 2018-15316.
  21. Shablia, V. (2012). The new cow milking method elaboration for ergonomic investigations in animal husbandry. Scientific and Technical Bulletin Institute of animal science, Vol. 117, pp. 177–184. Available at:http://animal.kharkov.ua/archiv/ntb/NTB107_17-09- 12.pdf (in Ukrainian).
  22. Lutsenko, M. M., Ivanyshyn, V. V., Smolyar, V. I. (2006). Promising technologies of milk production. Kyiv, Academy. 192 p. (in Ukrainian).
AttachmentSize
PDF icon borshch_1_2023.pdf484.83 KB