You are here

×

Error message

Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in bootstrap_table() (line 238 of /var/www/html/sites/all/themes/bootstrap/templates/system/table.func.php).

Productive traits of sheep of different genotypes

The effect of industrial crossbreeding on the productive qualities of purebred Tsigai and Romanov sheep breeds was investigated. The following indicators were studied: the survival of the young for the period from birth to their weaning; dynamics of live weight of sheep and goats in the corresponding age periods (at birth, at 2-, 4-, 6,5-month age); meat productivity; wool productivity and sheepskin quality.

The lambs and suckers were found to have live weight at birth of 3.9 and 4.2 kg respectively, which is 8.3 and 7.6 % higher than in purebred lambs. The difference in live weight of local and purebred lambs is statistically significant (P>0,999).The average daily growth for the whole period in the local sheep was 192 g, in the fossa 171 g, which is 4.3 and 4.9 % respectively more than in purebred peers.

It is proved that the local young is characterized by better viability: the preservation of lambs to beating was 132.2 % against 115.3 % in purebreds.

It was studied that the mass of chilled carcass in purebred lambs was 14.14 kg, and in domestic 14.3% more (P>0,999). It was investigated that animals in the experimental group had an average of 12.49 kg of flesh in the carcass, which is 77.3 % by weight of the carcass. In purebred lambs these figures are respectively 10.52 kg or 74.4 %. The difference in the pulp mass between the carcasses of the study groups was 1.97 kg or 18.7% (P>0.999). The fat content of the mixture was superior to pure-bred animals, resulting in a higher calorie content of 8.34 %.

Proven lambs during fattening were shown to have a greater increase in live weight compared to purebred by 13.6%. At the same time, they consumed less feed units by 4.7 %.

In terms of the original dirty wool, the highest indices were in the local brightnesses. Along with this, they also outperformed purebred animals by 2.48 kg, or 10.7%. It should be noted that in Romanov sheep, as a rule, fluff is exaggerated. This trend is preserved in the received mixes. The difference in the length of the down and the bones was 32.2 % (P>0,999). It is noted that the area of sheep sheep of the experimental group was more control by 7.4 % (P>0.95) and amounted to 84.0 dm2. The same pattern was observed in the area of exposed sheepskin.

Key words: wool, lamb, sheepskin, live weight, viability, lambs, Romanov breed, Tsigai breed.

1. Pokhil, V.I., Pokhil, O.M., Linsky, O.V., Golinskaya, O.Yu. (2017). Promyslove shreshhuvannja u vivcharstvi za uchasti porody sharove [Industrial crossbreeding in sheep breeding with the participation of layered rock]. Tvarynnyctvo ta tehnologii' harchovyh produktiv [Livestock and food technology]. no. 271, рр. 149–156.

2. Ulyanov, A. N., Kulikova, A. Ya., Shestakov, A. Yu. (2001). Rost y razvedenye chystoporodnyh jagnjat severokavkazskoj mjaso-sherstnoj porody y ee pomesej s porodoj teksel' [Growth and breeding of pure-bred lambs of the North Caucasian meat and wool breed and its crossbreeds with Texel]. Ovcy, kozy, sherstnoe delo [Sheep, goats, woolly business]. no. 3, рр. 20–21.

3. Sviridov, V. I., Pavlov, M. B. (2001). Rost i mjasnaja produktivnost' jagnjat kavkazskoj porody i pomesej ot baranov teksel' i ostfrizskoj porod [Growth and meat productivity of Caucasian lambs and crosses from Texel rams and Ostfries breed]. Ovcy, kozy, sherstnoe delo [Sheep, goats, woolly business]. no. 4, рр. 66–68.

4. Chepur, V. K. (1998). Ispol'zovanie selekcionnyh dostizhenij dlja formirovanija konkurentosposobnoj otrosli ovcevodstva Odesskoj oblasti [Use of selection achievements for the formation of a competitive growth of sheep husbandry in Odessa region]. Vіvcharstvo [Sheep breeding]. Issue 30, рр. 121–122.

5. Petrenko, I. P., Zubets, M. V., Vinnychuk, D. T., Petrenko, A. P. (1997). Genetyko-populjacijni procesy pry rozvedenni tvaryn [Genetic population processes in animal breeding]. Kyi'v: Agrarna nauka [Agrarian Science, Kyiv]. 478 p.

6. Gojchuk, O. I. (2007). Osnovni pryncypy prodovol'choi' bezpeky v umovah global'noi' prodovol'choi' kryzy [Basic principles of food security in the conditions of global food crisis]. Available at: http: //elibrary.nubip.edu. ua / 13648/1 / 12goi.pdf. 3.

7. Koshchiy, O. V. (2013). Problemy zabezpechennja naselennja Ukrai'ny prodovol'stvom. ISSN 2071-4653 Soc.-ek. problemy suchas. periodu Ukrai'ny [Problems of providing the Ukrainian population with food, ISSN 2071-4653 Social economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine]. Issue 6 (104), рp. 441–448.

8. Birman, V. F., Ukraintseva, I. V. (2015). Ovcevodstvo kak prioritetnaja otrasl' agrarnoj jekonomiki [Sheep breeding as a priority branch of the agricultural economy]. Trudy Kubanskogo agrarnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta  [Proceedings of the Kuban Agrarian State University]. no. 53, рр. 7–10.

9. Vdovichenko, Yu. V., Iovenko, V. M., Zharuk, P. G. (2012). Stan vivcharstva na suchasnomu etapi transformuvannja ekonomichnyh vidnosyn v Ukrai'ni [State of sheep farming at the present stage of transformation of economic relations in Ukraine]. Naukovyj visnyk «Askanija-Nova» [Scientific Bulletin "Askania-Nova"]. Naukovo-teoretychnyj fahovyj zhurnal [Scientific-theoretical professional magazine]. Issue 5, Part I, рр. 3–9.

10. Timofyshin, I. I., Deresh, O. M. (2010). Vidgodivel'ni jakosti ta m’jasna produktyvnist' pomisnyh m’jaso-vovnovyh baranciv [Feedback qualities and meat productivity of local meat and wool sheep]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' Podil's'kogo derzhavnogo agrarno-tehnichnogo universytetu [Collection of scientific works of Podilsky State Agrarian and Technical University]. Ser. «Tehnologija vyrobnyctva i pererobky produkcii' tvarynnyctva» [Series "Technology of production and processing of livestock products"]. Issue 18, рр. 205–207.

11. Kitaeva, A. P., Slyusarenko, I. S. (2017). Rozvytok novonarodzhenyh jagnjat cygajs'koi' porody zalezhno vid genotypu bat'kiv [Development of newborn lambs of the Tsigai breed depending on the genotype of the parents]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo derzhavnogo agrarno-ekonomichnogo universytetu [Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economic University]. Dnipro, no. 1, рp. 95–98.

12. Aboneev, V. V. (2011). Produktivnost' jarok raznyh genotipov [Productivity of different genotypes]. Ovcy, kozy, sherstjanoe delo [Sheep, goats, woolen work]. no. 4, рр. 9–11.

13. Aboneev, V. V. (2011). Otkormochnye i mjasnye kachestva molodnjaka ovec raznogo napravlenija produktivnosti [Feeding and meat qualities of young sheep of different directions of productivity]. Ovcy, kozy, sherstjanoe delo [Sheep, goats, woolen work]. no. 4, рр. 34–36.

14. Vovchenko, B. A., Korbich N. M. (2018). Efektyvnist' shreshhuvannja ovec' tavrijs'kogo typu askanijs'koi' porody z m’jaso-sal'nymy j m’jasnymy baranamy [Effectiveness of crossbreeding of Tavria sheep of Ascania breed with meat-fat and meat rams]. Tavrijs'kyj naukovyj visnyk [Tavria Scientific Bulletin]. Ser. «Sil's'kogospodars'ki nauky» [Agricultural Sciences Series]. Kherson: Аіland, Issue 99, рр. 167–173.

15. Sheridan, A. K. (1981). Crossbreeding and heterosis. Animal Breeding Abstracts. Vol. 49, рр. 131–139.

16. Gochiyaev, Kh. N. (2014). Mjasnaja produktivnost' baranchikov sovetskoj mjaso-sherstnoj porody, materi kotoryh imeli raznuju zhivuju massu [Meat productivity of sheep of the Soviet meat-wool breed, whose mothers had different live weight]. Ovcy, kozy, sherstjanoe delo [Sheep, goats, wool]. no. 1, рр. 31–32.

17. Еlbeltagy, A. R. (2017). Sheep Genetic Diversity and Breed Differences for Climate-Change Adaptation. Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change. рр. 149–171. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4714-5_6.

18. Sejian, V., Samal, L., Soren, N. M., Bagath, M., Krishnan, G., Vidya, M. K., Bhatta, R. (2017). Adaptation Strategies to Counter Climate Change Impact on Sheep. Sheep Production Adapting to Climate Change. рр. 413–430. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4714-5_20.

19. Mykytyuk, V. V., Severov, O. V. (2015). Spadkova zumovlenist' i minlyvist' produktyvnyh oznak u jarok za vplyvu baraniv-plidnykiv [Inheritance conditionality and variability of productive traits in the bright due to the influence of sheep-breeders]. Rozvedennja i genetyka [Breeding and genetics]. Kyiv: Agrarian Science, Issue 50, рр. 55–60.

AttachmentSize
PDF icon likhach_2_2019.pdf246.77 KB