You are here

Stabilization of enzyme prepareition protosubtilin G3X for use it on poultry farming

Enzyme preparations witchused in animal breeding are unstable. Instability is due to a partial or complete inactivation of the enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract under the influence of a strongly acidic environment, inhibitors and proteases. Increasing the effectiveness of the use of exogenous enzyme preparations is possible by the creation of stabilized forms of biopreparations. To do this, use the principles and methods of engineering enzymology. The aim of the research is to determine the optimal conditions for the immobilization of the enzyme preparation of protosubtilin G3X (proteolytic spectrum of the action) by the adsorption method. Conduct a comparative evaluation of the properties of native and immobilized biocatalysts on the conditions in vitro and in vivo.

Proteolytic activity was determined by Anson's method. The amount of protein on the carrier was evaluated by reducing its concentration in the reaction mixture, measured with Lowry O.H. et al .. The activity of the immobilized enzyme was expressed as a percentage of the activity of the native enzyme. The pH solutions were measured on the potentiometer pH- 340. For immobilization weused enzyme preparation of protosubtilin G3X with an activity of 70 units / g, as a carrier we used zeolite.

The immobilization procedure consisted of mixing the buffer solution of the enzyme with the carrier. During research and study of the influence of the ionic strength of the solution and pH on the adsorption process it was established that the catalytic activity of the obtained preparation falls in the buffers: phosphate, citrate, borate, acetate. Moreover, with an increase in the ionic strength of the solution, regardless of its composition, the enzyme activity of preparation was reduced. Optimal for immobilization was a 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution with pH in the range of 7.0–7.4. Protosubtilin G3X lost 80 % of the initial activity during immobilization in water.

When determining the capacity of a carrier, it is found that 1 g of zeolite adsorbs 29.8 mg of protein. The maximum specific activity of the enzyme (0.16 U / mg protein) is appeared at the optimum load of the carrier 22.5 mg protein per 1 g zeolite and corresponded to 85.7 % of the activity of the native protosubtilin G3X. Consequently, the optimal conditions for the immobilization of protosubtilin G3X on zeolite are: 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution with pH 7.0–7.4, temperature 20–25 ºС, carrier capacity 22.5 mg / g, duration of the process 2 years.

In experiments in vitro studied the dependence of the catalytic activity of the pH value in the range of 1.5 to 8.0. After 1 hour of incubation in the buffer solutions, it was found that the optimal value of pH for both forms of preparations coincides (pH 7.2). With pH-inactivation of native and immobilized forms of protosubtilin G3X, the loss of catalytic activity of the modified preparation was significantly less than the native. Moreover, a significant expansion of the pH profile in the acidic zone was observed for the immobilized enzyme. If the native enzyme retained 20 % of the original activity at pH 5.0 and irreversibly inactivated at pH 4.5–4.8; the immobilized enzyme retained 42 % of the activity at pH 4.0.

We studied the proteolytic activity of digestive enzymes in different parts of the gastrointestinal tract of broilers: goitre (pH 4.5–5.8), glandular stomach (pH 3.6–4.7), duodenum (pH 5.7–6.2). The proteolytic activity of the contents of goiter in the groups of chickens witch received native and immobilized protosubtilin G3X, was the same or higher, than in the control groups (p <0.01). The value of the proteolytic activity of the contents of the glandular stomach in the group of broiler chickens witch received the native enzyme sharply decreased almost to the level of the value in the control group. same value in the group witch received the immobilized enzyme was higher by 30 % (p <0.05). There was also an increase of the proteolytic activity in the chyme of the duodenum in the experimental groups of chicks (p <0.05); however, the catalytic activity in the group witch received the immobilized enzyme, was higher by 12.8 %.

It should be noted that in conditions in vivo, in contrast to similar conditions in vitro, was observed partial reactivation of the catalytic properties of the native protosubtilin G3X after exposure to the strongly acid medium of the glandular stomach, which is obviously related to the biological environment of the protein molecule.

To show the intensity of metabolic processes witch provide growth and development of broiler, we use the integral indicator as productivity. Feeding of immobilized protosubtilin G3X to chickens positively influenced the weight gain and helped to reduce feed costs. At the end of the experiment, the weight of the chicks receiving the native enzyme was higher by 9.0 % (p> 0.1) and immobilized by 16.0 % (p <0.05) compared to the control group. The feed costs for 1 kg of gain in both experimental groups were the same (2.40 kg) and less than in the control group by 5.8 %.

Key words: enzyme, immobilization, native enzyme, zeolite, adsorption, proteolytic activity, pH, buffer solution.

 

  1. Kononenko, S. I. (2014). Jeffektivnyj sposob povyshenija produktivnosti [An effective way to increase productivity]. Politematicheskij setevoj jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta [Polytechnical network electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University]. no. 98, pp. 759–768. Available at: http://ej.kubagro.ru/2014/04/pdf/33.pdf/.
  2. Egorov, B. V., Kuz'menko, Ju. Ja. (2014). Vvedennja preparativ biologichno aktyvnyh rechovyn do skladu kombikormivdlja sil's'kogospodars'koi'ptyci [Introduction of preparations of biologically active substances into compound feed for agricultural poultry]. Materiály Xmezinárodní vědecko-praktická konference “Efektivní nástrojemoderníchvěd 2014” [Mat. X Int. Scien. and Pract. Conf. "Effective Tools of Modern Science – 2014"]. Praha, pp. 49–50.
  3. Kaloev, B. S., Pshacieva, Z. V., Ibragimov, M. O. (2017). Jeffektivnost' ispol'zovanija fermentnyh preparatov pri vyrashhivanii cypljat-brojlerov [Effect of using ferment preparation at chicken-broilers rearing]. Permskij agrarnyj vestnik [Perm Agrarian Journal]. Veterinarija i zootehnija Veterinaryan dlivestock breeding]. no. 3 (19), pp.129–135.
  4. Tukhbatov, I. A (2016). Jeffektivnost' primenenija kompleksnyh kormovyh dobavok [The effectiveness of the use of complex feed additives]. Agrarnyj vestnik Urala [Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals]. no. 8, pp. 64–68.
  5. Ponomarenko, Yu. A. (2016). Teorija i praktika primenenija fermentnyh preparatov Fekord v kormlenii pticy [Theory and practice of the use of ferment preparations Fecord in feeding a bird]. V Kazahstanskij mezhdunarodnyj forum pticevodov (Astana, 26 avgusta 2016 g.) [V Kazakhstan International Poultry Forum (Astana, August 26, 2016)]. Astana, pp. 78–80.
  6. Kaloev, B.S., Ibragimov, M. O. (2016). Prirosty zhivoj massy cypljat-brojlerov ot ispol'zovanija fermentny preparatov.[Broiler chickens live weight gain depending on using enzyme preparations]. Izvestija FGBOU VO «GGAU» [News FGBOU VO «Gorsky State Agrarian University»]. Vol. 53, no. 2,pp. 88–93.
  7. Kovaleva, T.A, Makarova, E.L. (2013). Stabilizatsija gljukoamilazy s pomosch'ju adsorbtsii na kollagene [Stabilization of glucoamylase by adsorption on collagen]. Sovremennye problemy biofiziki slozhnyh sistem. Informatsionno- obrazovatel'nye protsessy : Mezhdunarodnaja nauchno-metodicheskaja konferentsija, 24-27 ijunja 2013, Voronezh. [Modern problems of biophysics of complex systems. Information and educational processes: International Scientific and Methodical Conference, June 24-27, 2013, Voronezh], pp. 55–58.
  8. Robinson, P.K. Enzymes: principles and biotechnological applications. Essays in Biochemistry. 2015, Vol. 59, pp. 1–41. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1042/bse0590001.
  9. Todosijchuk, T.S. (2015). Vstanovlennja tehnologichnyh rezhymiv otrymannja immobilizovanogo gidrolitychnogo fermentnogo preparatu [Establishment of the technological modes of receiving the immobilized hydrolytic enzyme preparation]. Visnyk NTU “HPI”, Har'kiv. [Bulletin of the NTU "KhPI"]. Kharkiv, no. 52(1161), pp. 122–126.
  10. Hodykina, M.O., Pershina, E.D., Kazdobin, K.A, Trunova, E.K. (2016). Stabilizacija nativnogo fermentnogo preparata na neorganicheskih nositeljah kaoline i ajerosile [Stabilization of a native enzyme preparation on inorganic carriers kaolin and aerosil]. Ukr. him. Zhurnal [Ukr. chem. Journal], Vol. 82, no 9, pp.57–63.
  11. Brena, B., González-Pombo, P., Batista-Viera, F. Immobilization of Enzymes: A Literature Survey [Book Section]. Methods Mol.Вiol.: Immobilization of Enzymes and Cells / ed. Guisan J. New York: Humana Press, 2013. Vol. 1051,
    pp. 15–31.
  12. Moehlenbrock, M. J., Minteer, S. D. Introduction to the Field of Enzyme Immobilization and Stabilization. Methods Mol. Biol. / ed. Guisan J. New York: Humana Press, 2017. Vol. 1504, pp. 1–9. Available at: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6499-4_1.
  13. Slivkin, A.I., Belenova, A.S., Dobrina, Ju.V., Provotorova, S. I. (2015). Izuchenie uslovij sovmestnoj immobilizacii tripsina i lipazy na hitozane [Studying of conditions immobilization of tripsin and lipase on the hitosane]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Himija. Biologija. Farmacija [Voronezh State University. Series: Chemistry. Biology Pharmacy]. no. 1, pp. 119–123.
  14. Enas, N. Danial., Amal, H. Hamza., Rasha, H. Mahmoud. Characteristic of Immobilized Urease on Grafted Alginate Bead Systems. Braz. Arch. biol. and technol. 2015, Vol.58, n.2. pp. 147–153. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-8913201400204.
  15. Sewczyk, T., Hoog, Antink M., Maas, M., Kroll, S., Beutel, S. Flowratedependent continuous hydrolysis of protein isolates.AMB Express, 2018, Vol. 8 (1), Publishedonline 2018 Feb 10. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0548-9.
  16. Zdarta, J., Meyer, A.S., Jesionowski, T., Pinelo, M.A. General Overview of Support Materials for Enzyme Immobilization: Characteristics, Properties, Practical Utility. Catalysts 2018, 8 (2), 92. Available at: http://doi:10.3390/catal8020092.
  17. Todosiichuk, T.S., Zelena, L.B., Klochko, V.V. Multistage selection of soil actinomycete Streptomyces albus as a producer of antimicrobial substances. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2015, Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 250–257. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v27i3.18267.
  18. Zdarta, J., Klapiszewski, L., Jedrzak, A., Nowicki, M., Moszynski, D., Jesionowski, T. Lipase B from Candida antarctica Immobilized on a Silica-Lignin Matrix as a Stable and Reusable Biocatalytic System. Catalysts 2017, 7, 14. Available at: http://doi 10.3390 / catal7010014.
  19. Dwevedi, Alka. Enzyme Immobilization : Advances in Industry, Agriculture, Medicine, and the Environment. Cham:Springer International Publishing. 2016, 141p. Available at: www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319414164.
  20. Singh, Raushan Kumar., Manish, Kumar Tiwari., Ranjitha, Singh., Jung-Kul, Lee. From protein engineering to immobilization: promising strategies for the upgrade of industrial enzymes. International journal of molecular sciences. 2013, no. 14(1), pp. 1232–1277.
  21. Talebi, M., Vaezifar, S., Jafary, F., Fazilati, M., Motamedi, S. Stability Improvement of Immobilized α-amylase using Nano Pore Zeolite. Iran J Biotechnol., 2016, no. 14(1), pp. 33–38. Available at: http://doi: 10.15171/ijb.1261.
  22. Kljueva, M.V. (2014). Osnovnye aspekty immobilizacii fermentov na primere lipaz [The main aspects of immobilization of enzymes by the example of lipases]. Molodoj uchenyj [Young Scientist]. no. 8, pp. 320–325. Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/67/11432/.
  23. Merzlov, S.V., (2013). Zgodovuvannja perepelam immobilizovanogo jodu, fermentiv ta helatu kobal'tu u skladi kombikormiv iz deficytom fosforu [Feeding quail immobilized iodine enzymes and cobalt in chelate stock fodder with deficiency of phosphorus]. Naukovyj visnyk LNUVMBT im. G'zhyc'kogo [Scientific messenger of LNUVMBT named after S.Z. Gzhytskyj]. Vol. 15, no. 1(4), pp. 128–132.
  24. GOST 20264.2–88. Preparaty fermentnye. Metody opredelenija proteoliticheskoj aktivnosti [State Standartd 20264.2–88. Enzyme preparations. Methods for determination of proteolytic activity]. Moscow, Standart inform Publ., 2005, 15 p.
  25. Lowry, O.H., Rosenbrougn, N.I., Farr, A.L., Randall, R. I. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, Vol. 193, no.1, pp. 265–275.
  26. Drogalev, A.A. (2017). Ispol'zovanie kremnijsoderzhashhih preparatov v pticevodstve [The use of silicon-containing medicaments in poultry farming]. Vestnik Krasnojarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [the Bulletin of KrasGAU]. no. 1 (124), pp. 44–51.
  27. Kerdjashov, N.N., Dar'in, A.I. (2016). Primenenie mestnyh netradicionnyh kormovyh dobavok v promyshlennom zhivotnovodstve [The use of local non-traditional feed additives in industrial livestock]. Penza, RIO of PSPA, 176 p.

 

AttachmentSize
PDF icon selezniova_2_2018.pdf304.29 KB