You are here

Головна » BTF №1 2024

Effectiveness of the use of enzyme preparation Hemicell® HT for growing young goslings

Agricultural waterfowl have certain biological characteristics: intensive metabolism and rapid growth, early maturity and signifcant reproduction potential, high body temperature, and resistance to many infectious diseases. The article presents the results of an experimental study of the effect of the exogenous enzyme preparation Hemicell® HT (1 kg contains the active ingredient β-mannase - 160x106 units) on the productive qualities of young goslings of Shadryna and Italian breeds. To achieve this goal, four experimental groups of goslings were formed: Group 1 - control, 2, 3, 4 - experimental, which were fed the enzyme preparation Hemicell® HT as part of a complete feed mixture - 150 g for the second experimental group, 250 g for the third and 310 g for the fourth experimental group per 1 tonne of fodder. It was found that the introduction of the exogenous enzyme preparation Hemicell® in the above doses into the diet of young geese signifcantly affects the growth rate of young geese and metabolic processes in their bodies. If at the end of the frst decade the most positive effect on the body was found in low and high dos- age of the enzyme preparation (birds of the 2nd and 4th groups), as a result of which, compared to the analogues of the 1st control group, the difference in the average daily gain was 3.4 and 2.8 g (p<0.001), then the average dosage of the enzyme preparation in the analogues of the 3rd experimental group provided a difference of only 1.1 g (p<0.01). However, by the end of the frst rearing period (up to 21 days), the highest average daily weight gain was observed in geese of the 3rd experimental group compared to the analogues of the control, 2nd and 4th experimental groups. Thus, while the average daily weight gain in geese of the 1st control group was 43.1 g, this fgure was 2.6 g higher in the 2nd group (p<0.01), 5.1 g in the 3rd group and 3.6 g in the 4th group (p<0.001). This pattern was maintained until the end of the experiment, with signifcant differences in goslings of the 3rd experimental group compared to the control: at the age of 31 days - by 9.7 g (p<0.01), 41 days - by 10.1 g (p<0.05), 66 days - by 9.2 g (p<0.05). In geese of the 2nd and 4th groups, the average daily weight gain was higher than in the control group, but did not have significant differences during the same age period. As a result, in general, the average daily weight gain of goslings of the 1st control group was 59.9 g, in the 2nd experimental group it was 3.1 g (p<0.01), or 5.2%, in the 3rd - 6.6 g (p<0.001), or 11%, and in the 4th group - 4.2 g (p<0.001), or 7.0%, compared to the same indicator of the control. The use of the enzyme preparation had a positive effect on the goslings' organism, which made it possible to realise the genetic potential of goslings' productivity at a higher level in all experimental groups, but the highest growth rate was observed in the 3rd experimental group of geese.

Key words: geese, Shadryna breed, Italian breed, enzyme preparation, Hemicell® HT, weight gain, live weight.

BABENKO S.


BOMKO V. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5558-6924


KUZMENKO O.


CHERNYAVSKYY O.


TYTARIOVA O.


SLOMCHINSKIY M.


NEDASHKIVSKY V.


SOBOLEVA S. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9102-9666


  1. Balanchuk, I. M. (2014). Praktychne zastosuvannia fermentiv u tvarynnytstvi [Practical use of enzymes in animal husbandry]. Ptakhivnytstvo Ukrainy i cvitu [Poultry breeding of Ukraine and the world]. Available at:http://market.avianua.com/?p=3958
  2. Bomko, L. H. (2014). Vplyv fermentu tseliulazy na khimichnyi sklad ta biolohichnu tsinnist m’iaziv kurchat-broileriv [Effect of cellulase enzyme on the chemical composition and biological value of broiler chicken muscles]. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva [Technology of production and processing of livestock products], no. 1, pp. 24–27. (in Ukrainian)
  3. Borysenko, K. (2018). Maibutnie kormovykh fermentiv [The future of feed enzymes]. Nashe Ptakhivnytstvo [Our Poultry]. Available at:https://agrotimes.ua/ article/majbutne-kormovih-fermentiv/ (in Ukrainian)
  4. Borodai, V. P., Sakhatskyi, M. I., Vetriichuk, A. I., Melnyk, V. V. (2006). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva produktsii ptakhivnytstva: pidruchnyk [Poultry production technology: textbook]. Vinnytsia: New Book, 360 p. (in Ukrainian)
  5. Fialovych, L., Kyryliv, I., Paskevych, H. (2018). Vyroshchuvannia husei z vykorystanniam netradytsiinykh dobavok u kombikormy [Breeding of geese with the use of non-traditional additives in compound feed]. Naukovyi visnyk LNU veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii [Scientifc Bulletin of the LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology]. Silskohospodarski nauky [Agricultural sciences], 20 (84), pp. 127–130. DOI:10.15421/nvlvet8423 (in Ukrainian)
  6. Liu, Z. L., Huang, X. F., Luo, Y., Xue, J. J., Wang, Q. G., Wang, Y.M., Wang, C. (2019). Effect of Dry and Wet Feed on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, and Apparent Nutrient Digestibility in Geese. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, Vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 1115–1120. DOI:10.3382/japr/pfz074
  7. Dobos, Á., Bársony, P., Posta, J., Babinszky, L. (2017). Effect of different lysine-metabolized energy ratio on performance of meat-type geese. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis, 73, pp. 39–42. DOI:10.34101/ actaagrar/73/1624
  8. Dobos, Á., Bársony, P., Posta, J., Babinszky, L. (2019). Effect of feeds with different crude fber content on the performance of meat goose. Acta Agraria Debreceniensis, 2, pp. 5–8. DOI:10.34101/ actaagrar/2/3670
  9. Fengming, Ch., Jieyi, He., Xin, W., Tuo, Lv., Chunjie, L., Liping, L., Zibo, Li., Jun, Z., Bingsheng, He., HuaJiao Q., Qian, L. (2022). Effect of Dietary Ramie Powder at Various Levels on the Growth Performance, Meat Quality, Serum Biochemical Indices and Antioxidative Capacity of Yanling White Geese. Animals, 12 (16), 2045 p. DOI:10.3390/ani12162045
  10. WenHua, G.E. (2017). Effects of straw fodder with low zinc level and adding phytase on growth performance, tibia development and antioxidant capacity of Wulong geese aged from 5 to 16 weeks. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 29, 7, pp. 2357–2365.
  11. Genedy, H., Shousha, S., Azab, M., Ismail, R., Nafeaa, A. (2018). Effect of β-Mannanase (Hemicell®) on Growth Performance andImmunity ofJapanese quail. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 34 (9), pp. 84–111. DOI:10.21608/BVMJ.2018.29415
  12. Guojun, L., Xu, L., Xiuhua, Z., Aizhong Z., Ning J., Lingyu Y., Meng H., Li Xu., Liyan D., Manyu Li., Zhenhua G., Xin Li., Jinyan S., Jingming Z., Yanzhong F., Haijuan He., Hongda Wu., Xiangkui Fu., He, M. (2018). Gut microbiota correlates with fber and apparent nutrients digestion in goose. Poultry Science, Vol. 97, Issue 11, pp. 3899–3909. DOI:10.3382/ps/ pey249
  13. Junshu, Y., Bo, Z., Yumeng, Xi., Hailin, H., Mingyang, Li., Jianning, Yu., Huanxi, Z., Zichun, D., Shijia, Y., Weiren, Z., Zhendan, S. (2019). Fermented feed regulates growth performance and the cecal microbiota community in geese. Poultry Science, Vol. 98, Issue 10, pp. 4673–4684. DOI:10.3382/ps/pez169
  14. Khalid, Al. Q., AlJohny, B. O., Wainwright, M. (2014). Antibacterial effects of pure metals on clinically important bacteria growing in planktonic cultures and bioflms. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 8 (10), pp. 1080–1088. DOI:10.15587/2313- 8416.2016.58827
  15. Plouhinec, L., Neugnot, V., Lafond, M., Berrin, J.-G. (2023). Carbohydrate-active enzymes in animal feed. Biotechnology Advances, Vol. 65. DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108145
  16. NabipourAfrouzi, H., Rezaei, M. Taghizadeh, V. (2016). Effect of guar meal and Hemicell enzyme on performance and carcass characteristics in broiler chicks. Animal Production Research. Vol. 4 (4), pp. 75–87.
  17. Hou, Q., Qian, Z., Wu, P., Shen, M., Long, Li., Zhao, W. (2020). 1-Deoxynojirimycin from mulberry leaves changes gut digestion and microbiota composition in geese. Poultry Science, Vol. 99, Issue 11, pp. 5858–5866. DOI:10. 1016/j.psj.2020.07.048
  18. Rychen, G., Aquilina, G., Azimonti, G., Bampidis, V., Bastos, M. de L. (2017). Safety and efcacy of Hemicell® HT (endo‐1,4‐β‐d‐mannanase) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying, turkey for fattening, turkeys reared for breeding, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and minor poultry and porcine species. EFSA Journal [Internet]. Wiley, 15 (1). DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2017. 4677
  19. Sobolev, O. I., Gutyj, B. V., Darmohray, L. M. (2019). Lithium in the natural environment and its migration in the trophic chain. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9 (2), pp. 195–203.
  20. Steven, C. Ricke., Sang, In Lee., Sun, Ae Kim., Si, Hong Park., Zhaohao, Shi. (2020). Prebiotics and the poultry gastrointestinal tract microbiome. Poultry Science, Vol. 99, Issue 2. DOI:10.1016/j. psj.2019.12.018
  21. Sun, Y., Guo, W., Wei, Y., Guo, X., Zhu, B. (2022). Effects of fermented feed on growth performance and intestinal microorganisms of Hebei meat geese. Pakistan J. Zool, pp. 1–13. DOI:10.3389/ fvets.2023.1284523
  22. Xu, Q., Yuan, X., Gu, T., Li, Y., Dai, W., Shen, X., Song, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, W., Chang, G., Chen, G. (2017). Comparative characterization of bacterial communities in geese fed all-grass or high-grain diets. PLoS One, 12 (10). DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0185590
  23. Yan, J., Zhou, B., Xi, Y., Huan, H., Li, M., Yu, J., Zhu, H., Dai, Z., Ying, S., Zhou, W., Shi, Z. (2019). Fermented feed regulates growth performance and the cecal microbiota community in geese. Poult Sci., 98 (10), pp. 4673–4684. DOI:10.3382/ps/pez169
  24. Zhang, Y. Y., Wang, B. W., Ge, W. H., Zhang, M. A., Yue, B., Zheng, H. W., Min, R., Zenan, Z. (2016). Linoleic acid on growth performance, slaughter performance, meat quality and nutrient availabilities of meat geese aged from 5 to 16 weeks. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr., 28, pp. 3473–3482.
AttachmentSize
PDF icon babenko_1_2024.pdf555 KB
BTF №1 2024