You are here

Головна » 2021 » BTF №1 2021

The growth rate of repair young pigs of Irish origin, depending on the combination of the original breeds

The article studied the growth dynamics of purebred and local gilts from birth to 180 days of age. The growth rate of these animals during the rearing period and the regularities of the difference in the growth rate of purebred and local pigs were also investigated. The uneven growth dynamics of both purebred and local replacement gilts has been established. The pigs obtained from the direct and reverse variants of crossbreeding of parental breeds grew more dynamically in comparison with their peers obtained from the purebred variant of breeding of the original breeds. Among purebred gilts, by weaning, the live weight of the Landrace breed increased more dynamically, while after weaning, the animals of the large white breed stood out with a greater intensity increase in live weight. Local gilts did not have a significant difference in the increase in live weight depending on the crossing option, although there was a tendency for a higher increase in live weight with age in pigs from Large White queens and Landrace boars compared to the reciprocal crossing option. During the period of rearing gilts, the highest growth rates were observed in local sows, both from the direct and reverse variants of crossing the animals of the original breeds. Purebred animals of both original breeds were inferior in growth intensity during the period of breeding to their local counterparts 3.0 – 6.3%. Among purebred animals, the least intensive growth during the period of breeding was the Landrace pigs, which were inferior in these indicators to the analogs of the Large White breed by 3.2%, and to the local pigs of both combinations by 6.3%. The advantages in live weight of local replacement gilts are due to their greater growth intensity in the period from weaning to testing at 180 days, which in turn is due to various forms of heterosis manifestation.

Key words: mumps, parent breeds, purebred breeding, crossing, heterosis, live weight, growth rate.

OHLOBLIA V. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4630-7222


POVOD M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2470-4921


  1. Lisnyi, V.A. (2002). Pidvyshhennja efektyvnosti geterozysnoi' selekcii' v svynarstvi shljahom ocinky kombinacijnoi' zdatnosti porid ta typiv svynej [Improving the efficiency of heterosis selection in pig breeding by assessing the combination ability of breeds and types of pigs]. Visnyk agrarnoi' nauky Prychornomor’ja [Bulletin of Agrarian Science of the Black Sea Coast]. Mykolaiv, Issue 3 (17), pp. 58–67.
  2. Vashchenko, P.A. (2009). Kombinacijna zdatnist' zavods'kyh linij svynej velykoi' biloi' porody [Combination ability of factory lines of large white breed pigs]. Bulletin of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy. no. 3, pp. 71–73.
  3. Piotrovych, N.A. (2017). Formuvannja vidtvorjuval'nyh jakostej svynomatok ta ocinka i'h kombinacijnoi' zdatnosti: avtoref. dys. … kand. s.-g. nauk: 06.02.01. [Formation of reproductive qualities of sows and an estimation of their combination ability: the dissertation author's abstract of the candidate of agricultural sciences: 06.02.01.]. Mykolaiv.
  4. Khramkova, O.M. (2019). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok za riznykh poiednan porid i typiv [Reproductive qualities of sows in different combinations of breeds and types]. Theoretical and Applied Veterinary Medicine. 7(2), pp.115– 119. Available at:https://doi.org/10.32819/2019.71021
  5. Tsereniuk, O.M. (2018). Metodologija vyznachennja efektu geterozysu v svynarstvi. [Methodology for determining the effect of heterosis in pig breeding]. Naukovo-tehnichnyj bjulleten' [Scientific and technical bulletin]. Issue 119, pp. 173–184
  6. Tsereniuk, O.M. (2010). Ob’jektyvna ocinka materyns'koi' produktyvnosti svynej [Objective assessment of maternal productivity of pigs]. Tavrijs'kyj naukovyj visnyk [Taurian Scientific Bulletin]. Issue 78, Part 2(I), pp. 221–227.
  7. Sheyko, R.I. (2012). Priemy i metody v selekcii svinej, obespechivajushhie vysokij jeffekt geterozisa v sistemah gibridizacii: monografija [Techniques and methods in pig breeding, providing a high effect of heterosis in hybridization systems: monograph]. Zhodino, Issue 263, pp. 4–23.
  8. Knecht, D., Srodon, S, Duziński, K. (2015). Breed on selected reproductive performance parameters of sows. Arch. Anim. Breed. Issue 58, pp. 49–56.
  9. Gorin, I.T., Nikitchenko, I.N. (1969). Vozmozhnost prognozirovaniya geterozisa u sviney [Possibility to predict heterosis in pigs]. BelNIIZh Proceedings, Vol. 10, pp. 104–106.
  10. Krasnoshchok, O.O. (2017). Vidtvorjuval'ni jakosti svynomatok za riznyh metodiv rozvedennja [Reproductive qualities of sows by different breeding methods]. Naukove zabezpechennja innovacijnogo rozvytku agropromyslovogo kompleksu v umovah zmin klimatu: mizhn. nauk.-pr. konf. molodyh vchenyh i specialistiv, m. Dnipro, 25-26 travnja 2017 r.: tezy dopovidi [Scientific support of innovative development of the agro-industrial complex in the conditions of climate change: international scientific-practical conference of young scientists and specialists, Dnipro, May 25-26, 2017: abstracts]. 179 p.
  11. Kovalenko, T.S. (2011). Udoskonalennja ocinky produktyvnyh i pleminnyh jakostej svynej za selekcijnymy indeksamy: avtoref. dys. … kand. s.-g.. nauk: 06.02.01. [Improving the assessment of productive and breeding qualities of pigs by selection indices: abstract of the dissertation of the candidate of agricultural sciences: 06.02.01.]. Poltava, 23 p.
  12. Ushakova, S.V. (2020). Varianty sochetanij hrjakov i svinomatok mjasnyh genotipov po urovnju reproduktivnyh kachestv [Variants of combinations of boars and sows of meat genotypes according to the level of reproductive qualities]. URL:http://dspace.ksau. kher-son.ua/ handle/123456789/102 5 (date of request 05.01.2020)
  13. Fediaieva, A.S. (2019). Obg'runtuvannja efektyvnoi' systemy porodno-linijnoi' gibrydyzacii' za vykorystannja terminal'nyh knuriv: avtoref. dys. … kand. s.-g. nauk: 06.02.01. [Substantiation of effective system of breed-linear hybridization for use of terminal boars: the dissertation author's abstract of the candidate of agricultural sciences: 06.02.01.]. Kharkiv, 19 p.
  14. Tsereniuk, O.M., Khvatov, A.I., Stryzhak, T.A. (2010). Ob’jektyvna ocinka materyns'koi' produktyvnosti svynej [Objective assessment of maternal productivity of pigs]. Taurian Scientific Bulletin. Issue 78, Part 2(I), pp. 221–227.
  15. Khramkova, O.M. (2019). Vidtvorjuval'ni jakosti svynomatok za riznyh pojednan' porid i typiv [Reproductive qualities of sows in different combinations of breeds and types]. Theoretical and Applied Veterinary Medicine. 7(2), pp. 115–119. Available at:https://doi.org/10.32819/2019.71021
  16. Phelps, A. (1976). New hybrid fromesteem Europe. Pig international. Issue 4(6), pp. 10–14.
  17. Shull, G.H. (1981). Hybridization methods in corn breeding. Amer. Breeding Magazine. Issue 1, pp. 98–107.
  18. Pylypets-Romaniuk, V.D. (2011). Osoblyvosti selektsii svynei [Features of pig breeding]. Modern animal husbandry. Available at:http://agro-business.com.ua/ agro/suchasne-tvarynnytstvo/item/8012-osoblyvosti-selektsii-svynei.html (date of request 05.01.2020)
  19. Povod, M.H., Bondarenko, M.S., Hryshchenko, S.M. (2015). Vidtvorjuval'ni jakosti svynej riznogo pohodzhennja [Reproductive qualities of pigs of different origins]. Scientific and technical bulletin. Issue 114, pp. 132–136.
  20. Kuhlers, D.L, Jungst, S.B., Little, J.A. (1989). Comparisons of specific crosses from Duroc-Landrace, Yorkshire-Landrace and Hampshire-Landrace sows managed in two types of gestation systems: pig performance. J Anim Sci. Issue 67(10), pp. 595–602.
  21. Huang, Y.H., Lee, Y.P., Yang, T.S. and Roan, S.W. (2003). Effects of Sire Breed on the Subsequent Reproductive Performances of Landrace Sows. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Issue 16(4), 7 p. Available at:https://doi. org/10.5713/ajas.2003.489.
  22. Mungate, F., Dzama, K., Mandisodza, K., Shoniwa, A. (2009). Some non-genetic factors affecting commercial pig production in Zimbabwe. South African Journal of Animal Science. Vol. 29. Available at:https://doi.org/ 10.4314/ sajas.v29i3.44202.
  23. Sundruma, A., Aragona, A., Schulze-Langenhorstb, C., Bütferingb, L., Henningc, M., Stalljohannb, G. (2011). Effects of feeding strategies, genotypes, sex, and birth weight on carcass and meat quality traits under organic pig production conditions. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. Vol. 58, Issues 3–4, pp. 163–172. Available at:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.njas.2011.09.006.
  24. Eyovwunu, D., Omeje, S.I., Akpodiete, J.O. (2016). Vplyv henotypu na reproduktyvni oznaky samok svynei [Influence of genotype on reproductive traits of female pigs]. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science. Issue 3, Vol. 9(I), pp. 20–22.
  25. Hetia, A.A. (2009). Organizacija selekcijnogo procesu v suchasnomu svynarstvi: monografija [Organization of selection process in modern pig breeding: monograph]. Poltava: Poltava writer, 192 p.
  26. Topikha, V.S., Lykhach ,V.Ia. and Lykhach, AV. (2013). M’jasni jakosti svynej porody landras za riznyh metodiv rozvedennja [Meat qualities of Landrace pigs by different breeding methods]. Zbirnyk naukovyh prac' Vinnyc'kogo NAU [Collection of scientific works of Vinnytsia NAU]. Agricultural sciences. Isue 5 (78), pp. 217–221.
  27. Genetychna struktura matochnogo pogoliv’ja v Ukrai'ni – ogljad [Genetic structure of uterine livestock in Ukraine - an overview]. Available at:http://asu.pigua.info/ news/764/?type=asu (date of request 05.01.2020)
AttachmentSize
PDF icon ohloblia_1_2021.pdf676.88 KB
2021
BTF №1 2021